Skip to content

Conversation

@japinderofficial-hub
Copy link

@japinderofficial-hub japinderofficial-hub commented Oct 31, 2025

🌟 Pre-submission Checklist

  • ⭐ I have starred the repository (mandatory before contributing)
  • πŸ’¬ I am a member of the Discord server: Join Here
  • πŸ“ I have signed up at helixque.netlify.app
  • πŸ“’ I have checked the #pull-request channel to ensure no one else is working on this issue
  • πŸ“ I have mentioned this PR in the Discord #pull-request channel

Summary

Brief description of what this PR accomplishes.

Type of Changes

  • πŸš€ Feature addition
  • πŸ› Bug fix
  • πŸ“š Documentation update
  • πŸ”§ Refactoring
  • 🎨 UI/UX improvements
  • ⚑ Performance optimizations
  • πŸ“± Mobile responsiveness
  • β™Ώ Accessibility improvements
  • Other: _____

Testing Completed

  • βœ… I have tested these changes locally
  • πŸ”§ Backend functionality works properly (if applicable)
  • 🎨 Frontend functionality works properly (if applicable)
  • 🌐 WebRTC connections work properly (if applicable)
  • πŸ“± Tested on different screen sizes/devices
  • πŸ”„ Tested edge cases (disconnections, reconnections, etc.)
  • πŸ§ͺ All existing functionality remains unaffected

Development Setup Verification

  • πŸ“¦ Dependencies installed for both frontend and backend
  • πŸš€ Development servers start without errors
  • πŸ—οΈ Code builds successfully

Code Quality

  • πŸ“ Follows existing TypeScript and React patterns
  • πŸ“ Uses meaningful variable and function names
  • πŸ’‘ Added comments for complex logic
  • 🎯 Code is properly formatted
  • πŸ” Self-review of the code has been performed

Related Issues

Closes #

Screenshots/Videos

Additional Notes

Any additional information or context about the changes.


Note: For faster PR review and approval, ensure you're active in our Discord server!

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added example and guidance for implementing password strength validation with requirements including minimum length, uppercase/lowercase letters, digits, and special characters.

Added a C++ program that checks password strength based on standard security guidelines.
This code helps users understand secure password practices β€” enhancing the project’s security awareness and practical coding examples.
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 31, 2025

Walkthrough

A new C++-like password strength checker demonstration is added to SECURITY1.md, implementing an isStrongPassword function that validates passwords meet minimum length and character-diversity requirements, along with a main function for interactive user input and emoji-annotated output.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Password Strength Checker
SECURITY1.md
Adds isStrongPassword function validating passwords for minimum length (8 chars) and required character types (uppercase, lowercase, digit, special character); includes main function with interactive input/output and emoji status indicators

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Program
    participant isStrongPassword

    User->>Program: Enters password
    Program->>isStrongPassword: Calls with password string
    activate isStrongPassword
    isStrongPassword->>isStrongPassword: Check length β‰₯ 8
    isStrongPassword->>isStrongPassword: Check for uppercase
    isStrongPassword->>isStrongPassword: Check for lowercase
    isStrongPassword->>isStrongPassword: Check for digit
    isStrongPassword->>isStrongPassword: Check for special char
    isStrongPassword-->>Program: Returns bool result
    deactivate isStrongPassword
    alt Password Strong
        Program->>User: Print success message βœ…
    else Password Weak
        Program->>User: Print warning message ⚠️
    end
    Program->>Program: Exit with code 0
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes

  • Single file with localized changes
  • Straightforward password validation logic using standard library functions
  • Verify character-type detection logic is correct (isupper, islower, isdigit coverage)
  • Confirm all five validation conditions are properly evaluated

Poem

🐰 A password strong, now tested true,
With uppercase and lowercase too,
A digit, special char in sight,
Eight characters make passwords right,
The checker hops with emoji delight! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (2 warnings)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description Check ⚠️ Warning The pull request description follows the required template structure with all expected sections present, but it is essentially unpopulated. The author has submitted the template as-is with unchecked checkboxes, placeholder text ("Brief description of what this PR accomplishes"), and empty fields for Related Issues, Screenshots/Videos, and Additional Notes. Critical information is missing: no actual summary of what the PR accomplishes, no type of changes selected, no testing verification, no code quality self-review confirmation, and no related issues linked. This represents a largely incomplete submission despite following the template format. The author should complete the pull request description by providing a genuine summary of the changes, selecting the appropriate type of changes (appears to be "Feature addition" based on the raw summary), confirming that testing was completed, verifying code quality standards were met, and linking any related issues if applicable. All checkbox items should be properly evaluated and checked if the conditions are met. The description should provide substantive information rather than leaving the template placeholders unfilled.
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
βœ… Passed checks (1 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title Check βœ… Passed The pull request title "Added Password Strength Checker (C++) for Better Security Awareness" directly and clearly aligns with the main change described in the raw summary: adding a new C++-like password strength checker demonstration to SECURITY1.md. The title is concise, specific, and accurately conveys the primary purpose of the changeset without vague terminology or noise. A teammate reviewing the git history would immediately understand that this PR introduces a password validation security feature implemented in C++.
✨ Finishing touches
πŸ§ͺ Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❀️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
SECURITY1.md (2)

7-20: Clarify special character validation logic.

Line 16's else hasSpecial = true; is overly broadβ€”it treats any non-alphanumeric character (including whitespace, punctuation, symbols) as "special." For a security-focused password checker, consider being more explicit about what constitutes a valid special character (e.g., !@#$%^&*). If this intentionally accepts any non-alphanumeric character for educational simplicity, add a clarifying comment.


22-34: Address input handling limitation: cin >> password only reads single-word passwords.

Line 25 uses cin >> password, which stops at the first whitespace. This means passwords with spaces (e.g., "MyPass word123!") will only capture "MyPass," silently truncating the user input. For an educational example on security awareness, either:

  • Add a comment explaining this limitation, or
  • Use getline(cin, password) to accept full-line input (handle newlines in the input buffer accordingly).

Additionally, consider adding basic error handling after the cin operation to gracefully handle input failures.

πŸ“œ Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

πŸ“₯ Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b9fad5d and 79de0da.

πŸ“’ Files selected for processing (1)
  • SECURITY1.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
πŸͺ› markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
SECURITY1.md

1-1: No space after hash on atx style heading

(MD018, no-missing-space-atx)


2-2: No space after hash on atx style heading

(MD018, no-missing-space-atx)


3-3: No space after hash on atx style heading

(MD018, no-missing-space-atx)

@jayanthjamin-web
Copy link
Member

@japinderofficial-hub this is not required

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants