Skip to content

Remove default == implementation for AbstractHoles#61

Merged
dekelzeldov merged 2 commits intomasterfrom
fix/hole-base-equality
Mar 20, 2026
Merged

Remove default == implementation for AbstractHoles#61
dekelzeldov merged 2 commits intomasterfrom
fix/hole-base-equality

Conversation

@ReubenJ
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@ReubenJ ReubenJ commented Mar 20, 2026

Implementers of new hole types should decide whether to follow the logic of a Hole, which has no children, or a UniformHole, which does.

Implementers of new hole types should decide whether to follow the logic of a `Hole`, which has no children, or a `UniformHole,` which does.
@ReubenJ ReubenJ requested a review from dekelzeldov March 20, 2026 12:53
@ReubenJ ReubenJ self-assigned this Mar 20, 2026
@codecov-commenter
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 95.18%. Comparing base (b11f526) to head (4cd86b4).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #61   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.18%   95.18%           
=======================================
  Files           4        4           
  Lines         270      270           
=======================================
  Hits          257      257           
  Misses         13       13           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@dekelzeldov dekelzeldov merged commit 709c64d into master Mar 20, 2026
3 of 7 checks passed
@dekelzeldov dekelzeldov deleted the fix/hole-base-equality branch March 20, 2026 14:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants