Conversation
|
it seems working fine for me |
|
Weird, testing on my end I've always had an output along those lines: The fact I have a dedicated IP means this isn't a "mass NAT" sort of issue. |
Co-authored-by: Rui Chen <rui@chenrui.dev>
69b7b7e to
256ada7
Compare
|
Ookla (owner of speedtest.net) has a first-party program and formula tap here: I would contribute it to homebrew-core or homebrew-cask, but:
Please correct me if I'm wrong. Otherwise, this is just a tip for anyone else looking for an alternative. |
|
Closed source software can be contributed to |
|
@bevanjkay doesn't homebrew-cask require that it be notarized with Apple now? This seems to fall into the gray area between homebrew-core and homebrew-cask. |
|
No, not really a gray area. Closed source software that doesn't pass Apple's Gatekeeper checks just can't go in any official Homebrew repository. But it looks like the binary does pass Gatekeeper, so you could open a PR to add the cask to |
|
@bevanjkay Are you sure? I tapped their cask and downloaded it, and I had to go to Security & Privacy to approve the binary before it would run. If indeed it is allowed in homebrew-cask, I'd happily submit a PR (and had even prepared one but held off because I thought this wasn't allowed.) |
|
Ah yes, you're correct. I download it with |
|
@bevanjkay Thanks. Yeah, I'll use their tap for now. I wish it could be added to Homebrew. Hopefully my comment above leads others to find the official tap if they depended on speedtest-cli. |
HOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>, where<formula>is the name of the formula you're submitting?brew test <formula>, where<formula>is the name of the formula you're submitting?brew audit --strict <formula>(after doingHOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>)? If this is a new formula, does it passbrew audit --new <formula>?speedtest-cli has failed to work for me for the past year. It seems it tries to fetch from an old list of servers, which tends to 429 very often. Fixes have been available for a while, but the maintainer of the project hasn't sent any message about them or touched the repository for the past 5 years. This could probably be fixed with patches, but first I think it is logical in that state to deprecate the formula.