Skip to content

Conversation

@huguestennier
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Oct 20, 2025

Deploy Preview for label-studio-docs-new-theme failed. Why did it fail? →

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 1b5cb45
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/label-studio-docs-new-theme/deploys/68ffe79bd61eba0008d776a2

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Oct 20, 2025

Deploy Preview for heartex-docs failed. Why did it fail? →

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 1b5cb45
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/heartex-docs/deploys/68ffe79bb84ddd0007c0f115

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Oct 20, 2025

Deploy Preview for label-studio-storybook canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 1b5cb45
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/label-studio-storybook/deploys/68ffe79b9afa6300086803cb

@github-actions github-actions bot added the docs label Oct 20, 2025
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Oct 20, 2025

Deploy Preview for label-studio-playground canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 1b5cb45
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/label-studio-playground/deploys/68ffe79b0a5e03000829db93

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 20, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 79.82%. Comparing base (0563c9f) to head (1b5cb45).
⚠️ Report is 5 commits behind head on develop.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           develop    #8678       +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage    67.06%   79.82%   +12.76%     
============================================
  Files          790      239      -551     
  Lines        60675    21684    -38991     
  Branches     10310        0    -10310     
============================================
- Hits         40690    17310    -23380     
+ Misses       19982     4374    -15608     
+ Partials         3        0        -3     
Flag Coverage Δ
lsf-e2e ?
lsf-integration ?
lsf-unit ?
pytests 79.82% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Contributor

@luarmr luarmr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, but there's a string that shouldn't be there. I'm wondering if it's an encoding issue in the file. I you can recheck all is good there
Thanks for this!!

# Customization

The ML backend can be customized by adding your own models and logic inside the `./bert_classifier` directory.
The ML backend can be customized by adding your own models and logic inside the `./bert_classifier` directory.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why this lines are being flag as a change? Looks it happened in several parts.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants