Conversation
ramilamparo
approved these changes
Jul 10, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bug: String Length Validation Now Counts Code Points
String validation methods (len, min, max, gt, gte, lt, lte) now use custom .refine() functions with [...val].length instead of Zod's native .min(), .max(), and .length() methods. This changes string length counting from UTF-16 code units to Unicode code points/graphemes, leading to different validation results for multi-byte characters and emojis. This breaking change appears to be an accidental side effect unrelated to the PR's goal of fixing recursive embedded structs.
zod.go#L939-L970
Lines 939 to 970 in 924b7cd
Was this report helpful? Give feedback by reacting with 👍 or 👎
satvik007
approved these changes
Jul 22, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This should fix #16 following colinhacks/zod#2984
Note that recursive schema handling is much simpler in v4 of zod. We won't have the need to handle recursive types differently (so a lot of code can be cleaned up) and we won't even get the current issue. Maybe we can support v4 of zod in v2 of zen