|
| 1 | +--- |
| 2 | +name: Feature request |
| 3 | +about: Propose a new capability or improvement for the project |
| 4 | +title: "[Feature Request]: " |
| 5 | +labels: enhancement, triage |
| 6 | +assignees: '' |
| 7 | + |
| 8 | +--- |
| 9 | + |
| 10 | +<!-- |
| 11 | +💡 Tip: When suggesting a feature, provide a high-level epic and concrete user stories. |
| 12 | +Include markdown examples, Mermaid diagrams, and MCP standards where appropriate. |
| 13 | +
|
| 14 | +Feel free to include feature requests to develop new components, MCP servers, tools, integrations, etc. |
| 15 | +--> |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | +### 🧭 Type of Feature |
| 18 | + |
| 19 | +Please select the most appropriate category: |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | +- [ ] Enhancement to existing functionality |
| 22 | +- [ ] New feature or capability |
| 23 | +- [ ] New MCP-compliant server |
| 24 | +- [ ] New component or integration |
| 25 | +- [ ] Developer tooling or test improvement |
| 26 | +- [ ] Packaging, automation and deployment (ex: pypi, docker, quay.io, kubernetes, terraform) |
| 27 | +- [ ] Other (please describe below) |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | +### 🧭 Epic |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +**Title:** <High-level feature or capability> |
| 32 | +**Goal:** What is the big-picture objective of this feature set? |
| 33 | +**Why now:** Why is this needed? Who benefits? |
| 34 | + |
| 35 | +--- |
| 36 | + |
| 37 | +### 🙋♂️ User Story 1 |
| 38 | + |
| 39 | +**As a:** <type of user> |
| 40 | +**I want:** <some goal> |
| 41 | +**So that:** <some reason / value> |
| 42 | + |
| 43 | +#### ✅ Acceptance Criteria |
| 44 | +```gherkin |
| 45 | +Scenario: First scenario title |
| 46 | + Given some starting state |
| 47 | + When an action occurs |
| 48 | + Then a result should happen |
| 49 | +
|
| 50 | +Scenario: Second scenario title |
| 51 | + Given another state |
| 52 | + When something else happens |
| 53 | + Then another result occurs |
| 54 | +``` |
| 55 | + |
| 56 | +--- |
| 57 | + |
| 58 | +### 🙋♂️ User Story 2 |
| 59 | + |
| 60 | +**As a:** <another type of user> |
| 61 | +**I want:** <a different goal> |
| 62 | +**So that:** <a different reason> |
| 63 | + |
| 64 | +#### ✅ Acceptance Criteria |
| 65 | +```gherkin |
| 66 | +Scenario: Third scenario title |
| 67 | + Given a specific setup |
| 68 | + When a user performs an action |
| 69 | + Then something meaningful happens |
| 70 | +``` |
| 71 | + |
| 72 | +--- |
| 73 | + |
| 74 | +### 📐 Design Sketch (optional) |
| 75 | + |
| 76 | +Include a diagram, sketch, or flow (use [Mermaid](https://mermaid.js.org/) if desired): |
| 77 | + |
| 78 | +```mermaid |
| 79 | +flowchart TD |
| 80 | + A[Client] -->|POST /completions| B(MCPGateway) |
| 81 | + B --> C[Completion Service] |
| 82 | +``` |
| 83 | + |
| 84 | +--- |
| 85 | + |
| 86 | +### 🔗 MCP Standards Check |
| 87 | + |
| 88 | +- [ ] Change adheres to current [MCP specifications](https://developer.ibm.com/tutorials/awb-handle-remote-tool-calling-model-context-protocol/) |
| 89 | +- [ ] No breaking changes to existing MCP-compliant integrations |
| 90 | +- [ ] If deviations exist, please describe them below: |
| 91 | + |
| 92 | +--- |
| 93 | + |
| 94 | +### 🔄 Alternatives Considered |
| 95 | + |
| 96 | +List any alternative designs, existing workarounds, or rejected ideas. |
| 97 | + |
| 98 | +--- |
| 99 | + |
| 100 | +### 📓 Additional Context |
| 101 | + |
| 102 | +Include related issues, links to discussions, issues, etc. |
0 commit comments