Skip to content

Conversation

@starpit
Copy link
Member

@starpit starpit commented Mar 18, 2025

If we find block_i such that block_(i+1) is a model block whose final input message was defined by block_i, then we can skip showing block_i. No sense in repeating ourselves...

If we find block_i such that block_(i+1) is a model block whose final input message was defined by block_i, then we can skip showing block_i. No sense in repeating ourselves...

Signed-off-by: Nick Mitchell <[email protected]>
@starpit starpit merged commit ff54158 into IBM:main Mar 18, 2025
6 checks passed
@starpit starpit deleted the squash branch March 18, 2025 14:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant