Fix issue 21 - reviewing the optimisation course

[stacyrse]

The comments on the content are on here: https://github.com/orgs/instituteofcancerresearch/projects/3/views/9?sliceBy%5Bvalue%5D=stacyrse&pane=issue&itemId=94444344&issue=ICR-RSE-Group%7Cteaching-engagement-tasks%7C21

All the commits only include spelling mistakes/grammar

[github-actions]

Thank you!

Thank you for your pull request 😃

🤖 This automated message can help you check the rendered files in your submission for clarity. If you have any questions, please feel free to open an issue in {sandpaper}.

If you have files that automatically render output (e.g. R Markdown), then you should check for the following:

• 🎯 correct output
• 🖼️ correct figures
• ❓ new warnings
• ‼️ new errors

Rendered Changes

🔍 Inspect the changes: https://github.com/ICR-RSE-Group/carpentry-pando-python/compare/md-outputs..md-outputs-PR-1

The following changes were observed in the rendered markdown documents:

 md5sum.txt                                 | 12 +++++------
 optimisation-data-structures-algorithms.md | 14 ++++++-------
 optimisation-introduction.md               | 28 ++++++--------------------
 optimisation-minimise-python.md            | 32 +++++++++++++++---------------
 profiling-functions.md                     | 16 +++++++--------
 profiling-introduction.md                  | 14 ++++++-------
 profiling-lines.md                         | 10 +++++-----
 7 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)

What does this mean?

If you have source files that require output and figures to be generated (e.g. R Markdown), then it is important to make sure the generated figures and output are reproducible.

This output provides a way for you to inspect the output in a diff-friendly manner so that it's easy to see the changes that occur due to new software versions or randomisation.

⏱️ Updated at 2025-01-22 16:49:56 +0000

[stacyrse]

Draft pull request has been approved by the reviewer (MIra) -> merging the pull request without another review