Minor change in the ShortenString Function for consistency in multiple receivers#10264
Minor change in the ShortenString Function for consistency in multiple receivers#10264Ag-Derek wants to merge 1 commit intoIDEMSInternational:masterfrom
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request addresses an issue with inconsistent receiver headers by refining the string shortening mechanism within the Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request modifies the ShortenString function to change the max length and consistently append a colon. My review includes a suggestion to refactor this function for improved clarity and efficiency by using separate return paths, which also avoids reassigning the input parameter.
| If strText.Length > maxLength Then | ||
| ' Trim the string to the specified length and add ellipsis | ||
| Return strText.Substring(0, maxLength) & "..." | ||
| strText = strText.Substring(0, maxLength) & "..." | ||
| End If | ||
| Return strText | ||
|
|
||
| Return strText & ":" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This implementation can be made clearer and more efficient. By using an If/Else block with separate return paths, you can avoid reassigning the strText parameter and perform the string concatenation in a single step for each case. This improves readability and reduces string operations.
If strText.Length > maxLength Then
' Trim the string to the specified length and add ellipsis
Return strText.Substring(0, maxLength) & "...:"
Else
Return strText & ":"
End If
|
@Ag-Derek many thanks. It is better, but not quite right. I'll send you a dataset to try: Here are some pictures from it:
This is what I wanted. Great - it is working nicely.
A short name for the data frame. Perfect!
Not so good for this name!
And this is a bit misleading. I note the name, in the receiver, is not left justified? Would that help? And maybe only 1 dot when the name is shortened? Finally I made a name starting
Now it is nowhere near showing the number of columns! |
|
@rdstern i tried with you dataset i realised the problem is not from the code but rather its from the UI, the receiver space for the dataset header is limited to the extend that only a few characters can display correctly so when we have extra characters like |
|
@Ag-Derek lets get rid of the extra characters! Also having the name |





…
Fixes #10259
This fixes the issue of the Receiver Headers not being consistent, I use the survey dataset and another dataset with a longer name to check for both cases.
@rdstern and @berylwaswa this is ready for review
Developer Testing Checklist