Skip to content

Conversation

@YuryHrytsuk
Copy link
Collaborator

@YuryHrytsuk YuryHrytsuk commented Oct 21, 2025

What do these changes do?

Make sure that durable queues are quorum instead of classic (see rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server#14763).

WARNING: this does not enforce queue type. Certain queue parameter may lead to a different type (e.g. exclusive queue are always classic)

Related issue/s

Related PR/s

Manual actions

For changes to take affect, update virtualhost metadata via rabbitmqctl

rabbitmqctl update_vhost_metadata / --default-queue-type quorum

Checklist

  • I tested and it works

Make sure that durable queues are quorum instead of classic (see
rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server#14763).

WARNING: this does not enforce queue type. Certain queue parameter may
lead to a different type (e.g. exclusive queue are always classic)

Related issue/s
* ITISFoundation#1232
Copy link
Contributor

@GitHK GitHK left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK with this, beware about the driver somehow overwriting the option (but this needs checking)

Copy link
Member

@mrnicegyu11 mrnicegyu11 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Acknowledged , don't have a lot of experience here, lgtm

Copy link
Member

@sanderegg sanderegg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks!

@YuryHrytsuk YuryHrytsuk merged commit 797bd15 into ITISFoundation:main Oct 21, 2025
3 checks passed
@YuryHrytsuk YuryHrytsuk deleted the rabbit-cluster-update-default-queue-type branch October 21, 2025 14:00
@YuryHrytsuk YuryHrytsuk changed the title RabbitMQ Cluster: make quorum default queue type RabbitMQ Cluster: make quorum default queue type ⚠️ Oct 21, 2025
YuryHrytsuk added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2025
YuryHrytsuk added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants