Skip to content

Conversation

@YuryHrytsuk
Copy link
Collaborator

@YuryHrytsuk YuryHrytsuk commented Sep 25, 2024

What do these changes do?

Avoid using specific jaeger node label since there is no need to bound jaeger to a node. ops node labels will suffice and will make service more restartable by using more generic ops node label

Related issue/s

Related PR/s

Checklist

  • I tested and it works

@YuryHrytsuk YuryHrytsuk added t:enhancement New feature or request p:mid-prio labels Sep 25, 2024
@YuryHrytsuk YuryHrytsuk self-assigned this Sep 25, 2024
@YuryHrytsuk YuryHrytsuk added this to the MartinKippenberger milestone Sep 25, 2024
@YuryHrytsuk YuryHrytsuk enabled auto-merge (squash) September 25, 2024 08:51
Copy link
Member

@mrnicegyu11 mrnicegyu11 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks a lot, looks good!

@YuryHrytsuk YuryHrytsuk merged commit e760de7 into ITISFoundation:main Sep 25, 2024
3 checks passed
@YuryHrytsuk YuryHrytsuk deleted the remove-jager-node-label branch September 25, 2024 08:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

p:mid-prio t:enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants