♻️ Using iso timedelta in settings

[GitHK]

What do these changes do?

In preparation of moving to pydantic2, timedelta fields now have to be formatted with the iso format.

minor: typo rename of some settings which has no impact

Related issue/s

How to test

Dev-ops checklist

• No ENV changes or I properly updated ENV (read the instruction)
• merge THIS before merging this PR

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 65.53%. Comparing base (cd20a2c) to head (5f15eae).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (cd20a2c) and HEAD (5f15eae). Click for more details.

HEAD has 29 uploads less than BASE

Flag	BASE (cd20a2c)	HEAD (5f15eae)
unittests	30	1

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #6656       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   87.68%   65.53%   -22.15%     
===========================================
  Files        1527      632      -895     
  Lines       60817    31803    -29014     
  Branches     2104      265     -1839     
===========================================
- Hits        53326    20842    -32484     
- Misses       7166    10900     +3734     
+ Partials      325       61      -264     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	64.86% <ø> (+0.01%)	⬆️
unittests	97.17% <100.00%> (+11.59%)	⬆️

Components	Coverage Δ
api	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_aws_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_dask_task_models_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_models_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_notifications_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_postgres_database	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_service_integration	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_service_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_settings_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_simcore_sdk	77.44% <ø> (-7.84%)	⬇️
agent	97.17% <100.00%> (ø)
api_server	∅ <ø> (∅)
autoscaling	∅ <ø> (∅)
catalog	∅ <ø> (∅)
clusters_keeper	∅ <ø> (∅)
dask_sidecar	∅ <ø> (∅)
datcore_adapter	∅ <ø> (∅)
director	∅ <ø> (∅)
director_v2	76.42% <ø> (-14.49%)	⬇️
dynamic_scheduler	∅ <ø> (∅)
dynamic_sidecar	59.79% <ø> (-30.01%)	⬇️
efs_guardian	∅ <ø> (∅)
invitations	∅ <ø> (∅)
osparc_gateway_server	79.42% <ø> (-5.73%)	⬇️
payments	∅ <ø> (∅)
resource_usage_tracker	∅ <ø> (∅)
storage	∅ <ø> (∅)
webclient	∅ <ø> (∅)
webserver	59.82% <ø> (-29.49%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update cd20a2c...5f15eae. Read the comment docs.

[mrnicegyu11]

ok i guess, i believe you

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud