🐛 Avoids raising error when composing disk usage

[GitHK]

What do these changes do?

From real world usage (used and free are differente):

{
  "HOST":           DiskUsage(used=70385278976, free=466223489024, total=536608768000, used_percent=13.12),
  "INPUTS_VOLUMES": DiskUsage(used=70385111040, free=466223656960, total=536608768000, used_percent=13.12)
}

It means that measurements cn be different between two parallel calls (which is feasible since the disk could be used).

A different approach to raising an error would be to remove fields which are not supported (filter them out).

Bonus: deprecated unused code

Related issue/s

How to test

Dev-ops checklist

• No ENV changes or I properly updated ENV (read the instruction)

[pcrespov]

In this PR, instead of raising, you are filtering and ignoring. right?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 68.10%. Comparing base (41817c8) to head (386a280).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (41817c8) and HEAD (386a280). Click for more details.

HEAD has 30 uploads less than BASE

Flag	BASE (41817c8)	HEAD (386a280)
unittests	31	1

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #6660       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   87.85%   68.10%   -19.76%     
===========================================
  Files        1568      613      -955     
  Lines       63366    31343    -32023     
  Branches     2089      265     -1824     
===========================================
- Hits        55671    21345    -34326     
- Misses       7377     9937     +2560     
+ Partials      318       61      -257     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	64.83% <0.00%> (-0.11%)	⬇️
unittests	88.85% <100.00%> (+2.93%)	⬆️

Components	Coverage Δ
api	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_aws_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_dask_task_models_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_models_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_notifications_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_postgres_database	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_service_integration	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_service_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_settings_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_simcore_sdk	77.44% <ø> (-7.84%)	⬇️
agent	∅ <ø> (∅)
api_server	∅ <ø> (∅)
autoscaling	∅ <ø> (∅)
catalog	∅ <ø> (∅)
clusters_keeper	∅ <ø> (∅)
dask_sidecar	∅ <ø> (∅)
datcore_adapter	∅ <ø> (∅)
director	∅ <ø> (∅)
director_v2	76.51% <ø> (-13.27%)	⬇️
dynamic_scheduler	∅ <ø> (∅)
dynamic_sidecar	89.79% <100.00%> (+0.07%)	⬆️
efs_guardian	∅ <ø> (∅)
invitations	∅ <ø> (∅)
osparc_gateway_server	79.42% <ø> (-5.99%)	⬇️
payments	∅ <ø> (∅)
resource_usage_tracker	∅ <ø> (∅)
storage	∅ <ø> (∅)
webclient	∅ <ø> (∅)
webserver	59.77% <ø> (-29.56%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 41817c8...386a280. Read the comment docs.

[GitHK]

In this PR, instead of raising, you are filtering and ignoring. right?

correct. I have also updated the description of the PR

[odeimaiz]

👍

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud