🎨 [Frontend] Improve Notification texts and Bell's UX

[odeimaiz]

What do these changes do?

This PR adds two more fields to the Notifications: resource_id and user_from_id.

Thanks to these new fields, the Notification UI element now contains more meaningful information:

{Resource} {NameOfResource}
was shared by {nameOfSharer}
{DateAndTime}

Also when tapping the bell, all the notifications will be marked as read.

New UI:

Marked as Read:

Related issue/s

• closes Notifications in bell, round 2 osparc-issues#934
• closes Notifications in bell: show study/templates names osparc-issues#1011
• closes TIP: notifications of shared studies osparc-issues#1770
• closes When I write a comment I am "unknown" ? #4459

How to test

Dev-ops checklist

• No ENV changes or I properly updated ENV (read the instruction)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 82.55%. Comparing base (9c6068d) to head (4848909).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (9c6068d) and HEAD (4848909). Click for more details.

HEAD has 27 uploads less than BASE

Flag	BASE (9c6068d)	HEAD (4848909)
unittests	31	4

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #6661      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   87.94%   82.55%   -5.40%     
==========================================
  Files        1564      613     -951     
  Lines       62982    31345   -31637     
  Branches     2106      265    -1841     
==========================================
- Hits        55389    25876   -29513     
+ Misses       7269     5408    -1861     
+ Partials      324       61     -263     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	64.84% <100.00%> (+0.02%)	⬆️
unittests	83.63% <100.00%> (-2.29%)	⬇️

Components	Coverage Δ
api	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_aws_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_dask_task_models_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_models_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_notifications_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_postgres_database	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_service_integration	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_service_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_settings_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_simcore_sdk	77.44% <ø> (-7.84%)	⬇️
agent	∅ <ø> (∅)
api_server	∅ <ø> (∅)
autoscaling	∅ <ø> (∅)
catalog	∅ <ø> (∅)
clusters_keeper	∅ <ø> (∅)
dask_sidecar	∅ <ø> (∅)
datcore_adapter	∅ <ø> (∅)
director	∅ <ø> (∅)
director_v2	77.06% <ø> (-13.85%)	⬇️
dynamic_scheduler	∅ <ø> (∅)
dynamic_sidecar	59.79% <ø> (-29.98%)	⬇️
efs_guardian	∅ <ø> (∅)
invitations	∅ <ø> (∅)
osparc_gateway_server	79.68% <ø> (-5.47%)	⬇️
payments	∅ <ø> (∅)
resource_usage_tracker	∅ <ø> (∅)
storage	∅ <ø> (∅)
webclient	∅ <ø> (∅)
webserver	89.27% <100.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9c6068d...4848909. Read the comment docs.

[pcrespov]

🔔 thx!

[sanderegg]

nice!

[jsaq007]

👍🏼

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud