🎨 moving folders to workspaces

[matusdrobuliak66]

What do these changes do?

• ✨ Expose moving folder to workspace api
• ♻️ Utilizing the new transaction_context to make complicated operations on DB

Helpers:

• Firstly check permissions

  • source folder "delete" access rights
  • all projects inside a folder "delete" access rights
  • destination workspace "write" access rights

• Private Workspace Folder --> Shared workspace (root)

  • update projects table "workspace_id" field
  • update folder_v2 table "workspace_id" field (all children) and "parent_folder_id" field with NULL (just for the one moving)
  • update projects_to_folders table -> Remove all records with children folders where "user_id" field is not the one moving
  • update projects_to_folders table -> Update "user_id" field with None
  • Remove project permissions

• Shared Workspace Folder --> Shared workspace (root)

  • update projects table "workspace_id" field
  • update folder_v2 table "workspace_id" field (all children) and "parent_folder_id" field with NULL (just for the one moving)
  • update projects_to_folders table -> Update "user_id" field with None
  • Remove project permissions

• Shared Workspace Folder --> Private workspace (root)

  • update projects table "workspace_id" field with NULL
  • update folder_v2 table "workspace_id" field (all children) with NULL and "parent_folder_id" field with NULL (just for the one moving)
  • update projects_to_folders table -> Update "user_id" field with USER ID integer
  • Add project permissions

Related issue/s

• closes Backend: Moving folders between workspaces osparc-issues#1724
• closes Implement test_project_workspace_movement_full_workflow #6778

How to test

Dev-ops checklist

• No ENV changes or I properly updated ENV (read the instruction)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 65.29%. Comparing base (6a7b073) to head (eabeafb).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (6a7b073) and HEAD (eabeafb). Click for more details.

HEAD has 29 uploads less than BASE

Flag	BASE (6a7b073)	HEAD (eabeafb)
unittests	31	2

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #6851       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   87.28%   65.29%   -21.99%     
===========================================
  Files        1557      648      -909     
  Lines       61890    31562    -30328     
  Branches     2108      263     -1845     
===========================================
- Hits        54018    20608    -33410     
- Misses       7541    10894     +3353     
+ Partials      331       60      -271     

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
integrationtests	64.73% <ø> (-2.26%)	⬇️	Carriedforward from 3dded08
unittests	91.64% <ø> (+5.23%)	⬆️

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

Components	Coverage Δ
api	78.42% <ø> (ø)
pkg_aws_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_dask_task_models_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_models_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_notifications_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_postgres_database	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_service_integration	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_service_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_settings_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_simcore_sdk	77.36% <ø> (-8.02%)	⬇️
agent	97.00% <ø> (ø)
api_server	∅ <ø> (∅)
autoscaling	∅ <ø> (∅)
catalog	∅ <ø> (∅)
clusters_keeper	∅ <ø> (∅)
dask_sidecar	∅ <ø> (∅)
datcore_adapter	∅ <ø> (∅)
director	∅ <ø> (∅)
director_v2	76.47% <ø> (-8.72%)	⬇️
dynamic_scheduler	∅ <ø> (∅)
dynamic_sidecar	59.86% <ø> (-29.86%)	⬇️
efs_guardian	∅ <ø> (∅)
invitations	∅ <ø> (∅)
osparc_gateway_server	79.79% <ø> (-5.70%)	⬇️
payments	∅ <ø> (∅)
resource_usage_tracker	∅ <ø> (∅)
storage	∅ <ø> (∅)
webclient	∅ <ø> (∅)
webserver	59.57% <ø> (-27.65%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 6a7b073...eabeafb. Read the comment docs.

[odeimaiz]

💅

[pcrespov]

really nice! Having things standardize allows me to follow your changes to a much greater degree. I left some suggestions. If there are not clear lets catch up in offline. thx!

[sanderegg]

nice! thanks

[odeimaiz]

Beautiful

[pcrespov]

thx!

[jsaq007]

Nice

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud