♻️ reroute get project inactivity via dynamic-scheduler

[GitHK]

What do these changes do?

Rerouted get project inactivity command via dynamic-scheduler.

Related issue/s

• dynamic scheduler: extract scheduling logic and move it away from director-v2 #5632
• requirement: reroute director-v2 service calls via dynamic-scheduler from webserver #6894
• closes redirect get_project_inactivity call via dynamic-scheduler #6950

How to test

Dev-ops checklist

• No ENV changes or I properly updated ENV (read the instruction)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 80.00000% with 6 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 86.84%. Comparing base (d75b0a3) to head (6612d10).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #6949      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   87.02%   86.84%   -0.19%     
==========================================
  Files        1621     1451     -170     
  Lines       63967    60223    -3744     
  Branches     2034     1645     -389     
==========================================
- Hits        55669    52300    -3369     
+ Misses       7965     7652     -313     
+ Partials      333      271      -62     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	64.98% <50.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
unittests	85.03% <80.00%> (-0.29%)	⬇️

Components	Coverage Δ
api	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_aws_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_dask_task_models_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_models_library	91.55% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
pkg_notifications_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_postgres_database	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_service_integration	70.02% <ø> (ø)
pkg_service_library	73.22% <0.00%> (-0.13%)	⬇️
pkg_settings_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_simcore_sdk	85.38% <ø> (ø)
agent	96.82% <ø> (ø)
api_server	90.13% <ø> (ø)
autoscaling	96.09% <ø> (ø)
catalog	90.57% <ø> (ø)
clusters_keeper	99.48% <ø> (ø)
dask_sidecar	91.26% <ø> (ø)
datcore_adapter	93.18% <ø> (ø)
director	76.40% <ø> (-0.09%)	⬇️
director_v2	91.46% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
dynamic_scheduler	97.19% <100.00%> (+0.04%)	⬆️
dynamic_sidecar	89.75% <ø> (ø)
efs_guardian	90.12% <ø> (ø)
invitations	93.44% <ø> (ø)
osparc_gateway_server	∅ <ø> (∅)
payments	92.66% <ø> (ø)
resource_usage_tracker	89.56% <ø> (+0.23%)	⬆️
storage	89.54% <ø> (ø)
webclient	∅ <ø> (∅)
webserver	84.33% <75.00%> (-0.10%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update d75b0a3...6612d10. Read the comment docs.

[pcrespov]

Basically the same question as in #6943 (review)

[sanderegg]

thanks

[pcrespov]

thx for the explanation.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud