♻️ Extract workbench from projects to projects_nodes table 🗃️

[giancarloromeo]

What do these changes do?

⚠️ This PR is the first step of a complete migration of workbench data from the projects table to the projects_nodes one (some parts might be refined later in next steps).

New columns are added to target table (i.e. projects_nodes) and existing data are copied as part of an Alembic migration.

Related issue/s

• Partially solves: Move projects workbench column to projects_nodes table #5646
• Unlocks: WIP: 🐛 Clean removal of output files #6986
• Adheres to: Apply Hexagonal Architecture #7040

How to test

Dev-ops checklist

• No ENV changes or I properly updated ENV (read the instruction)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 91.13924% with 14 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 87.68%. Comparing base (272671c) to head (5ece129).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #7010      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   87.66%   87.68%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files        1632     1626       -6     
  Lines       63663    63524     -139     
  Branches     2050     2050              
==========================================
- Hits        55810    55701     -109     
+ Misses       7516     7486      -30     
  Partials      337      337              

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	67.96% <41.40%> (+3.16%)	⬆️
unittests	85.95% <85.44%> (+0.01%)	⬆️

Components	Coverage Δ
api	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_aws_library	93.49% <ø> (ø)
pkg_dask_task_models_library	97.09% <ø> (ø)
pkg_models_library	91.43% <84.61%> (-0.03%)	⬇️
pkg_notifications_library	84.57% <ø> (ø)
pkg_postgres_database	88.41% <100.00%> (+0.09%)	⬆️
pkg_service_integration	70.02% <ø> (ø)
pkg_service_library	74.13% <ø> (ø)
pkg_settings_library	90.49% <ø> (ø)
pkg_simcore_sdk	85.38% <ø> (ø)
agent	96.45% <ø> (ø)
api_server	90.54% <ø> (ø)
autoscaling	96.09% <ø> (ø)
catalog	90.66% <ø> (ø)
clusters_keeper	99.24% <ø> (ø)
dask_sidecar	91.26% <ø> (ø)
datcore_adapter	93.18% <ø> (ø)
director	76.42% <ø> (-0.09%)	⬇️
director_v2	91.40% <ø> (+0.11%)	⬆️
dynamic_scheduler	97.21% <ø> (ø)
dynamic_sidecar	89.75% <ø> (ø)
efs_guardian	90.39% <ø> (ø)
invitations	93.42% <ø> (ø)
osparc_gateway_server	∅ <ø> (∅)
payments	92.66% <ø> (ø)
resource_usage_tracker	89.06% <ø> (+0.11%)	⬆️
storage	89.57% <ø> (ø)
webclient	∅ <ø> (∅)
webserver	86.17% <90.62%> (-0.10%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 272671c...5ece129. Read the comment docs.

[matusdrobuliak66]

Thanks!

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
2 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud