✨ Adding catalog client to dynamic-scheduler ⚠️

[GitHK]

What do these changes do?

Adds catalog client to dynamic-scheduler. Note: this client is not currently used.

Related issue/s

• closes requirement: add catalog client to dynamic-scheduler #7163
• dynamic scheduler: extract scheduling logic and move it away from director-v2 #5632

How to test

Dev-ops checklist ⚠️

• NO extra changes required
• No ENV changes or I properly updated ENV (read the instruction)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 87.04%. Comparing base (dd342a3) to head (522ff8c).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #7162      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   82.71%   87.04%   +4.32%     
==========================================
  Files        1355     1647     +292     
  Lines       55239    64245    +9006     
  Branches      826     1095     +269     
==========================================
+ Hits        45692    55923   +10231     
+ Misses       9293     8010    -1283     
- Partials      254      312      +58     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	65.30% <ø> (-0.07%)	⬇️
unittests	86.03% <100.00%> (+3.48%)	⬆️

Components	Coverage Δ
api	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_aws_library	94.02% <ø> (∅)
pkg_dask_task_models_library	97.09% <ø> (ø)
pkg_models_library	91.53% <ø> (∅)
pkg_notifications_library	84.57% <ø> (ø)
pkg_postgres_database	88.25% <ø> (ø)
pkg_service_integration	70.03% <ø> (ø)
pkg_service_library	72.54% <ø> (+0.05%)	⬆️
pkg_settings_library	90.61% <ø> (ø)
pkg_simcore_sdk	85.46% <ø> (ø)
agent	96.46% <ø> (ø)
api_server	90.55% <ø> (ø)
autoscaling	96.08% <ø> (ø)
catalog	91.71% <ø> (ø)
clusters_keeper	99.24% <ø> (ø)
dask_sidecar	91.25% <ø> (∅)
datcore_adapter	93.19% <ø> (∅)
director	76.59% <ø> (ø)
director_v2	91.26% <ø> (+12.38%)	⬆️
dynamic_scheduler	97.33% <100.00%> (+0.14%)	⬆️
dynamic_sidecar	89.77% <ø> (ø)
efs_guardian	90.25% <ø> (∅)
invitations	93.28% <ø> (ø)
osparc_gateway_server	∅ <ø> (∅)
payments	92.66% <ø> (∅)
resource_usage_tracker	88.73% <ø> (-0.06%)	⬇️
storage	86.22% <ø> (ø)
webclient	∅ <ø> (∅)
webserver	84.79% <ø> (+5.44%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update dd342a3...522ff8c. Read the comment docs.

[sanderegg]

Q: is there no RPC entrypoint instead of using REST?

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud