♻️ webserver: catalog & api_keys renaming of modules

[pcrespov]

What do these changes do?

This PR is part of the ongoing refactoring effort within the webserver.

Following discussions with @bisgaard-itis, it aligns certain conventions in catalog and api_keys to be consistent with the patterns established in the refactored domains.

This PR refactors and renames various files and imports within the simcore_service_webserver.catalog and simcore_service_webserver.api_keys modules. Specific changes include renaming _exceptions_handlers to _controller_rest_exceptions, consolidating schemas into _controller_rest_schemas, and updating pagination parameters. Additionally, new routes were added for managing service tags.

Related issue/s

• Follows up from ♻️ Refactor and polish api keys domain of webserver #7293
• Follows up from ♻️ Refactor catalog domain in webserver #7308
• Follows up from ♻️🎨 web-server: enhances product domain #7294

How to test

cd services/web/server
make install-dev
pytest -vv tests --cov=simcore_service_webserver --cov-config=/home/crespo/repos/osparc-simcore/.coveragerc  tests/unit/**/*catalog*.py

Dev-ops

None

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 85.91549% with 10 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 88.64%. Comparing base (60f74ff) to head (6f6db36).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #7334      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   87.35%   88.64%   +1.29%     
==========================================
  Files        1704     1370     -334     
  Lines       66217    56744    -9473     
  Branches     1123      481     -642     
==========================================
- Hits        57844    50303    -7541     
+ Misses       8053     6309    -1744     
+ Partials      320      132     -188     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	65.34% <69.11%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
unittests	87.69% <85.91%> (+1.17%)	⬆️

Components	Coverage Δ
api	76.84% <ø> (ø)
pkg_aws_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_dask_task_models_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_models_library	91.72% <100.00%> (ø)
pkg_notifications_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_postgres_database	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_service_integration	70.03% <ø> (ø)
pkg_service_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_settings_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_simcore_sdk	85.46% <ø> (ø)
agent	96.46% <ø> (ø)
api_server	90.68% <ø> (ø)
autoscaling	96.08% <ø> (ø)
catalog	92.12% <ø> (ø)
clusters_keeper	99.24% <ø> (ø)
dask_sidecar	91.25% <ø> (ø)
datcore_adapter	98.11% <ø> (ø)
director	76.59% <ø> (-0.10%)	⬇️
director_v2	91.30% <ø> (ø)
dynamic_scheduler	97.33% <ø> (ø)
dynamic_sidecar	90.07% <ø> (ø)
efs_guardian	89.79% <ø> (ø)
invitations	93.28% <ø> (ø)
osparc_gateway_server	∅ <ø> (∅)
payments	92.66% <ø> (ø)
resource_usage_tracker	89.22% <ø> (+0.10%)	⬆️
storage	85.49% <ø> (-0.13%)	⬇️
webclient	∅ <ø> (∅)
webserver	85.79% <85.29%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 60f74ff...6f6db36. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[sanderegg]

I wonder how people managed to use controller to describe the API entrypoints when there was a well known pattern where the controller is the logics part. anyway. just names but still very bad choosing.

[bisgaard-itis]

Thanks a lot Pedro 🤙
I will follow up with the changes we discussed.

[GitHK]

👍

[giancarloromeo]

Good.

Only one thing: module names are getting longer and longer (like German words). What about using packages (e.g. controllers/rest instead of controller_rest)?

[pcrespov]

Good.

Only one thing: module names are getting longer and longer (like German words). What about using packages (e.g. controllers/rest instead of controller_rest)?

noted.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud