🎨Storage with Celery: unit tests working now with storage worker implemented

[sanderegg]

What do these changes do?

this PR sets up the base framework for testing storage with a storage celery worker (fixture with_storage_celery_worker)

• test/modules/celery --> gone
• test_modules_celery.py now there with example on how to use it

@giancarloromeo now needs to use the redis/rabbitmq instead of cache:memory I guess.

Related issue/s

How to test

Dev-ops checklist

• No ENV changes or I properly updated ENV (read the instruction)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 67.74194% with 10 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 87.44%. Comparing base (d0d22ce) to head (43dc3b8).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #7438      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   87.32%   87.44%   +0.11%     
==========================================
  Files        1714     1708       -6     
  Lines       66602    66423     -179     
  Branches     1131     1132       +1     
==========================================
- Hits        58159    58082      -77     
+ Misses       8121     8020     -101     
+ Partials      322      321       -1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	65.14% <ø> (-0.05%)	⬇️
unittests	86.61% <67.74%> (+0.11%)	⬆️

Components	Coverage Δ
api	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_aws_library	94.24% <ø> (ø)
pkg_dask_task_models_library	97.09% <ø> (ø)
pkg_models_library	92.05% <ø> (ø)
pkg_notifications_library	84.57% <ø> (ø)
pkg_postgres_database	88.11% <ø> (ø)
pkg_service_integration	70.03% <ø> (ø)
pkg_service_library	72.97% <86.66%> (-0.06%)	⬇️
pkg_settings_library	90.78% <ø> (ø)
pkg_simcore_sdk	85.46% <ø> (ø)
agent	96.46% <ø> (ø)
api_server	90.68% <ø> (ø)
autoscaling	96.08% <ø> (ø)
catalog	92.14% <ø> (ø)
clusters_keeper	99.24% <ø> (ø)
dask_sidecar	91.25% <ø> (ø)
datcore_adapter	98.11% <ø> (ø)
director	76.61% <ø> (ø)
director_v2	91.30% <ø> (+0.02%)	⬆️
dynamic_scheduler	97.33% <ø> (ø)
dynamic_sidecar	90.11% <ø> (ø)
efs_guardian	89.79% <ø> (ø)
invitations	93.28% <ø> (ø)
payments	92.66% <ø> (ø)
resource_usage_tracker	89.12% <ø> (ø)
storage	86.29% <50.00%> (+1.72%)	⬆️
webclient	∅ <ø> (∅)
webserver	85.76% <ø> (+0.08%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update d0d22ce...43dc3b8. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[bisgaard-itis]

Very nice. Thanks a lot!

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[pcrespov]

go go go