Skip to content

Conversation

@bisgaard-itis
Copy link
Contributor

@bisgaard-itis bisgaard-itis commented Mar 27, 2025

What do these changes do?

Related issue/s

How to test

Dev-ops checklist

@bisgaard-itis bisgaard-itis self-assigned this Mar 27, 2025
@bisgaard-itis bisgaard-itis added the bug buggy, it does not work as expected label Mar 27, 2025
@bisgaard-itis bisgaard-itis added this to the The Awakening milestone Mar 27, 2025
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 27, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 25.00000% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 68.76%. Comparing base (653b60a) to head (f4fe4a2).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (653b60a) and HEAD (f4fe4a2). Click for more details.

HEAD has 29 uploads less than BASE
Flag BASE (653b60a) HEAD (f4fe4a2)
unittests 30 1
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #7440       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   87.42%   68.76%   -18.66%     
===========================================
  Files        1717      728      -989     
  Lines       66606    34322    -32284     
  Branches     1132      168      -964     
===========================================
- Hits        58233    23603    -34630     
- Misses       8052    10661     +2609     
+ Partials      321       58      -263     
Flag Coverage Δ
integrationtests 65.13% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️
unittests 86.11% <25.00%> (-0.48%) ⬇️
Components Coverage Δ
api ∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_aws_library ∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_dask_task_models_library ∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_models_library ∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_notifications_library ∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_postgres_database ∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_service_integration ∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_service_library ∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_settings_library ∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_simcore_sdk 77.30% <ø> (-8.16%) ⬇️
agent ∅ <ø> (∅)
api_server ∅ <ø> (∅)
autoscaling ∅ <ø> (∅)
catalog ∅ <ø> (∅)
clusters_keeper ∅ <ø> (∅)
dask_sidecar ∅ <ø> (∅)
datcore_adapter ∅ <ø> (∅)
director ∅ <ø> (∅)
director_v2 78.55% <ø> (-12.74%) ⬇️
dynamic_scheduler ∅ <ø> (∅)
dynamic_sidecar 89.08% <ø> (-1.04%) ⬇️
efs_guardian ∅ <ø> (∅)
invitations ∅ <ø> (∅)
payments ∅ <ø> (∅)
resource_usage_tracker ∅ <ø> (∅)
storage 86.11% <25.00%> (+0.04%) ⬆️
webclient ∅ <ø> (∅)
webserver 59.06% <ø> (-26.80%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 653b60a...f4fe4a2. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@bisgaard-itis
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Mergifyio queue

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Mar 27, 2025

queue

🛑 The pull request has been removed from the queue default

The pull request can't be updated.

You can take a look at Queue: Embarked in merge queue check runs for more details.

In case of a failure due to a flaky test, you should first retrigger the CI.
Then, re-embark the pull request into the merge queue by posting the comment
@mergifyio refresh on the pull request.

@bisgaard-itis bisgaard-itis added the 🤖-automerge marks PR as ready to be merged for Mergify label Mar 27, 2025
@sanderegg sanderegg merged commit af8e683 into ITISFoundation:master Mar 27, 2025
90 of 94 checks passed
@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Mar 27, 2025

This pull request has been removed from the queue for the following reason: pull request branch update failed.

The pull request can't be updated

You should update or rebase your pull request manually.

If you want to requeue this pull request, you can post a @mergifyio requeue comment.

@bisgaard-itis bisgaard-itis deleted the fix-celery-backend-client-bug branch March 27, 2025 08:19
@matusdrobuliak66 matusdrobuliak66 mentioned this pull request Apr 15, 2025
56 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

🤖-automerge marks PR as ready to be merged for Mergify bug buggy, it does not work as expected

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants