🎨 add WAITING_FOR_RESOURCES to get_pipeline_state_from_task_states

[matusdrobuliak66]

What do these changes do?

• 🎨 add WAITING_FOR_RESOURCES to get_pipeline_state_from_task_states --> fixing: if task was in state WAITING_FOR_RESOURCES it was reported as ERROR in the Comp runs

Related issue/s

• relates web API: extension to manage job queue (May) osparc-issues#1645

How to test

Dev-ops

[GitHK]

Q: why is this required?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 69.91%. Comparing base (4bd14ca) to head (547cbcb).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (4bd14ca) and HEAD (547cbcb). Click for more details.

HEAD has 30 uploads less than BASE

Flag	BASE (4bd14ca)	HEAD (547cbcb)
unittests	31	1

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #7640       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   87.75%   69.91%   -17.84%     
===========================================
  Files        1788      692     -1096     
  Lines       68979    32523    -36456     
  Branches     1134      170      -964     
===========================================
- Hits        60530    22740    -37790     
- Misses       8138     9725     +1587     
+ Partials      311       58      -253     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	64.95% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
unittests	84.48% <ø> (-2.48%)	⬇️

Components	Coverage Δ
api	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_aws_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_dask_task_models_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_models_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_notifications_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_postgres_database	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_service_integration	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_service_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_settings_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_simcore_sdk	77.41% <ø> (-8.43%)	⬇️
agent	∅ <ø> (∅)
api_server	∅ <ø> (∅)
autoscaling	∅ <ø> (∅)
catalog	∅ <ø> (∅)
clusters_keeper	∅ <ø> (∅)
dask_sidecar	∅ <ø> (∅)
datcore_adapter	∅ <ø> (∅)
director	∅ <ø> (∅)
director_v2	91.08% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
dynamic_scheduler	∅ <ø> (∅)
dynamic_sidecar	89.06% <ø> (-1.10%)	⬇️
efs_guardian	∅ <ø> (∅)
invitations	∅ <ø> (∅)
payments	∅ <ø> (∅)
resource_usage_tracker	∅ <ø> (∅)
storage	∅ <ø> (∅)
webclient	∅ <ø> (∅)
webserver	59.13% <ø> (-26.95%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4bd14ca...547cbcb. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[matusdrobuliak66]

Q: why is this required?

because it is missing. if task is in state WAITING_FOR_RESOURCES it is reported as ERROR in the RUNs

[GitHK]

maybe add your comment to the description of the PR, the reason for the change was not clear to me

[sanderegg]

pair reviewed

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud