🐛 fix project-v0.0.1.json schema

[matusdrobuliak66]

What do these changes do?

• 🐛 fix project-v0.0.1.json schema

Related issue/s

• fixes api test that started to fail after 🎨 add project template type 🚨 (🗃️) #7677

How to test

Dev-ops

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 65.84%. Comparing base (17a8abf) to head (76ee199).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (17a8abf) and HEAD (76ee199). Click for more details.

HEAD has 30 uploads less than BASE

Flag	BASE (17a8abf)	HEAD (76ee199)
unittests	31	1

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #7684       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   87.55%   65.84%   -21.71%     
===========================================
  Files        1802      710     -1092     
  Lines       70121    34049    -36072     
  Branches     1137      170      -967     
===========================================
- Hits        61391    22421    -38970     
- Misses       8420    11570     +3150     
+ Partials      310       58      -252     

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
integrationtests	63.29% <ø> (-1.15%)	⬇️	Carriedforward from 17a8abf
unittests	76.80% <ø> (-9.97%)	⬇️

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

Components	Coverage Δ
api	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_aws_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_dask_task_models_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_models_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_notifications_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_postgres_database	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_service_integration	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_service_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_settings_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_simcore_sdk	77.24% <ø> (-8.25%)	⬇️
agent	∅ <ø> (∅)
api_server	∅ <ø> (∅)
autoscaling	∅ <ø> (∅)
catalog	∅ <ø> (∅)
clusters_keeper	∅ <ø> (∅)
dask_sidecar	∅ <ø> (∅)
datcore_adapter	∅ <ø> (∅)
director	76.80% <ø> (-0.10%)	⬇️
director_v2	77.71% <ø> (-13.42%)	⬇️
dynamic_scheduler	∅ <ø> (∅)
dynamic_sidecar	89.06% <ø> (-1.10%)	⬇️
efs_guardian	∅ <ø> (∅)
invitations	∅ <ø> (∅)
payments	∅ <ø> (∅)
resource_usage_tracker	∅ <ø> (∅)
storage	∅ <ø> (∅)
webclient	∅ <ø> (∅)
webserver	56.85% <ø> (-28.99%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 17a8abf...76ee199. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[pcrespov]

is this still used somewhere? I am suprised :-)(

[sanderegg]

do we still use that old piece of json???