✨ Add Controller for /me/function-permissions Endpoint in Functions Domain

[pcrespov]

What do these changes do?

This PR introduces a controller in the functions domain that serves the GET /me/function-permissions endpoint, as required by the front-end in #7888.

It leverages the existing service-layer functionality exposed in #7868 via _functions_service.get_functions_user_api_access_rights.

The implementation follows a minimalistic approach, focusing on fulfilling the immediate client requirements, while being structured to allow easy future extensions (e.g. expanding the response model or improving test coverage).

• NOTE: @odeimaiz due to camel-case rule, you have to modify a bit the fields you use in your response model.

Related issue/s

• Follows up AFTER PR Add global functions user permissions 🎨 #7868 is merged!
• Implementing Disable create function ability osparc-issues#1901

How to test

cd services/web/server
make install-dev
pytest -vv tests/unit/with_dbs/04/functions_rpc -k test_list_user_functions_permissions

Dev-ops

None

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 81.81818% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 89.50%. Comparing base (5d5eac3) to head (649826b).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #7901      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   87.94%   89.50%   +1.55%     
==========================================
  Files        1845     1441     -404     
  Lines       71130    59784   -11346     
  Branches     1220      476     -744     
==========================================
- Hits        62558    53511    -9047     
+ Misses       8220     6152    -2068     
+ Partials      352      121     -231     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	64.23% <55.55%> (+0.01%)	⬆️
unittests	87.82% <81.81%> (+1.28%)	⬆️

Components	Coverage Δ
api	76.84% <ø> (ø)
pkg_aws_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_dask_task_models_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_models_library	93.25% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
pkg_notifications_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_postgres_database	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_service_integration	69.92% <ø> (ø)
pkg_service_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_settings_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_simcore_sdk	84.99% <ø> (-0.06%)	⬇️
agent	96.29% <ø> (ø)
api_server	91.85% <ø> (ø)
autoscaling	96.03% <ø> (ø)
catalog	92.29% <ø> (ø)
clusters_keeper	99.13% <ø> (ø)
dask_sidecar	91.79% <ø> (ø)
datcore_adapter	∅ <ø> (∅)
director	76.82% <ø> (+0.09%)	⬆️
director_v2	91.07% <ø> (-0.08%)	⬇️
dynamic_scheduler	96.69% <ø> (ø)
dynamic_sidecar	90.09% <ø> (ø)
efs_guardian	89.65% <ø> (ø)
invitations	93.00% <ø> (ø)
payments	92.57% <ø> (ø)
resource_usage_tracker	89.03% <ø> (-0.17%)	⬇️
storage	87.71% <ø> (+0.24%)	⬆️
webclient	∅ <ø> (∅)
webserver	87.52% <77.77%> (+0.03%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5d5eac3...649826b. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[wvangeit]

Looks good. Thanks.

[odeimaiz]

Merci!!

[pcrespov]

@mergify queue

[mergify]

queue

🟠 Waiting for conditions to match

• any of: [🔀 queue conditions]
  • all of: [📌 queue conditions of queue default]
    • label=🤖-automerge
    • #approved-reviews-by >= 2 [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
    • #approved-reviews-by>=2
    • #changes-requested-reviews-by = 0 [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
    • #changes-requested-reviews-by=0
    • #review-threads-unresolved = 0 [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
    • #review-threads-unresolved=0
    • -conflict
    • -draft
    • base=master
    • branch-protection-review-decision = APPROVED [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
    • label!=🤖-do-not-merge
    • any of: [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
      • check-skipped = deploy to dockerhub
      • check-neutral = deploy to dockerhub
      • check-success = deploy to dockerhub
    • any of: [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
      • check-success = system-tests
      • check-neutral = system-tests
      • check-skipped = system-tests
    • any of: [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
      • check-success = unit-tests
      • check-neutral = unit-tests
      • check-skipped = unit-tests
    • any of: [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
      • check-success = check OAS' are up to date
      • check-neutral = check OAS' are up to date
      • check-skipped = check OAS' are up to date
    • any of: [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
      • check-success = integration-tests
      • check-neutral = integration-tests
      • check-skipped = integration-tests
    • any of: [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
      • check-success = build-test-images (frontend) / build-test-images
      • check-neutral = build-test-images (frontend) / build-test-images
      • check-skipped = build-test-images (frontend) / build-test-images
• -closed [📌 queue requirement]
• -conflict [📌 queue requirement]
• -draft [📌 queue requirement]
• any of: [📌 queue -> configuration change requirements]
  • -mergify-configuration-changed
  • check-success = Configuration changed

[odeimaiz]

@mergify queue

[mergify]

queue

🛑 The pull request has been merged manually

The pull request has been merged manually at 975e587

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud