🐛 Fix incorrect setup of IN_DEBT transaction state

[matusdrobuliak66]

What do these changes do?

• 🐛 Fix incorrect setup of IN_DEBT transaction state

Related issue/s

• closes 🐛 RUT - wrongly close transaction to IN_DEBT when it should be billed #7907

How to test

Dev-ops

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 68.12%. Comparing base (9b7bd7c) to head (838287f).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (9b7bd7c) and HEAD (838287f). Click for more details.

HEAD has 31 uploads less than BASE

Flag	BASE (9b7bd7c)	HEAD (838287f)
unittests	32	1

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #7908       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   87.96%   68.12%   -19.85%     
===========================================
  Files        1845      739     -1106     
  Lines       71149    34510    -36639     
  Branches     1220      176     -1044     
===========================================
- Hits        62589    23509    -39080     
- Misses       8208    10943     +2735     
+ Partials      352       58      -294     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	64.24% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
unittests	89.00% <100.00%> (+2.44%)	⬆️

Components	Coverage Δ
api	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_aws_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_dask_task_models_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_models_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_notifications_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_postgres_database	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_service_integration	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_service_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_settings_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_simcore_sdk	76.98% <ø> (-8.07%)	⬇️
agent	∅ <ø> (∅)
api_server	∅ <ø> (∅)
autoscaling	∅ <ø> (∅)
catalog	∅ <ø> (∅)
clusters_keeper	∅ <ø> (∅)
dask_sidecar	∅ <ø> (∅)
datcore_adapter	∅ <ø> (∅)
director	∅ <ø> (∅)
director_v2	77.63% <ø> (-13.47%)	⬇️
dynamic_scheduler	∅ <ø> (∅)
dynamic_sidecar	88.33% <ø> (-1.77%)	⬇️
efs_guardian	∅ <ø> (∅)
invitations	∅ <ø> (∅)
payments	∅ <ø> (∅)
resource_usage_tracker	89.00% <100.00%> (+0.02%)	⬆️
storage	∅ <ø> (∅)
webclient	∅ <ø> (∅)
webserver	58.95% <ø> (-28.54%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9b7bd7c...838287f. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[sanderegg]

Thanks!
Nevertheless I would suggest to have a test that check the complete computation so that this not happen again in case of refactoring or code changes.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud