✨ Enhance Account Request Flow with Pre-Registration and PO Approval Handling

[pcrespov]

What do these changes do?

This PR introduces two key changes to the account request flow:

1. ✨ When a user submits a "Request Account" form (request_product_account), support is notified via email (as before), and a new pre-registration entry is created in the database. This entry is visible to the PO in the PO Center.
2. ✨ When a PO reviews and approves a request (approve_user_account), an invitation link is generated and stored in the pre-registration entry’s extra info. A notification email to the user with this link will be added in a future iteration.

Additionally, the implementation handles error cases such as duplicate pre-registrations (already approved or denied).

Details

• ✨rest.preregistartion.request_product_account handler
  • uses _preregistration_service.create_pre_registration
    • users_service.pre_register_user
• ♻️ login domain
  • _rest_exceptions: Adds exception handlers to map cases like AlreadyPreRegisteredError to 409

Follow up changes

• In the front-end: UI/UX Adjustments in the PO center for Approval/Deny of account requests #8044
• In the backend
  • ♻️ CSR layers in users domain
  • ♻️ move registration outside login domain
  • Notify approval to user with an invitation link (resend option)
  • Add logic for do/undo/redo-action e.g. re-approve w/ different invitation params, etc... ?

Related issue/s

• part of ITISFoundation/private-issues#23
• resolves https://github.com/ITISFoundation/private-issues/issues/69
• resolves remove usage of external tool (fogbugz) from workflow osparc-issues#1877

How to test

cd services/web/server
make install-dev
pytet -vv tests/unit/with_dbs/03/login/test_login_preregistration.py

Dev-ops

None

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 91.22807% with 5 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 89.65%. Comparing base (04ffd16) to head (e23592f).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #8026      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   87.89%   89.65%   +1.75%     
==========================================
  Files        1853     1457     -396     
  Lines       71495    60125   -11370     
  Branches     1258      477     -781     
==========================================
- Hits        62843    53907    -8936     
+ Misses       8288     6097    -2191     
+ Partials      364      121     -243     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	64.20% <53.57%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
unittests	88.04% <91.22%> (+1.50%)	⬆️

Components	Coverage Δ
api	76.84% <ø> (ø)
pkg_aws_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_celery_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_dask_task_models_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_models_library	93.27% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
pkg_notifications_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_postgres_database	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_service_integration	69.92% <ø> (ø)
pkg_service_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_settings_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_simcore_sdk	85.10% <ø> (+0.05%)	⬆️
agent	96.29% <ø> (ø)
api_server	92.64% <ø> (ø)
autoscaling	96.03% <ø> (ø)
catalog	92.21% <ø> (ø)
clusters_keeper	99.13% <ø> (ø)
dask_sidecar	91.79% <ø> (-0.57%)	⬇️
datcore_adapter	97.94% <ø> (ø)
director	76.82% <ø> (+0.09%)	⬆️
director_v2	91.02% <ø> (+0.01%)	⬆️
dynamic_scheduler	96.69% <ø> (ø)
dynamic_sidecar	90.09% <ø> (ø)
efs_guardian	89.65% <ø> (ø)
invitations	93.60% <ø> (ø)
payments	92.57% <ø> (ø)
resource_usage_tracker	88.89% <ø> (-0.22%)	⬇️
storage	86.36% <ø> (+0.08%)	⬆️
webclient	∅ <ø> (∅)
webserver	87.72% <91.07%> (+0.01%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 04ffd16...e23592f. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[pcrespov]

@mergify queue

[mergify]

queue

🟠 Waiting for conditions to match

• -closed [📌 queue requirement]
• -conflict [📌 queue requirement]
• -draft [📌 queue requirement]
• any of: [📌 queue -> configuration change requirements]
  • -mergify-configuration-changed
  • check-success = Configuration changed
• any of: [🔀 queue conditions]
  • all of: [📌 queue conditions of queue default]
    • #approved-reviews-by >= 2 [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
    • #approved-reviews-by>=2
    • #changes-requested-reviews-by = 0 [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
    • #changes-requested-reviews-by=0
    • #review-threads-unresolved = 0 [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
    • #review-threads-unresolved=0
    • -conflict
    • -draft
    • base=master
    • branch-protection-review-decision = APPROVED [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
    • label!=🤖-do-not-merge
    • label=🤖-automerge
    • any of: [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
      • check-skipped = deploy to dockerhub
      • check-neutral = deploy to dockerhub
      • check-success = deploy to dockerhub
    • any of: [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
      • check-success = system-tests
      • check-neutral = system-tests
      • check-skipped = system-tests
    • any of: [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
      • check-success = unit-tests
      • check-neutral = unit-tests
      • check-skipped = unit-tests
    • any of: [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
      • check-success = check OAS' are up to date
      • check-neutral = check OAS' are up to date
      • check-skipped = check OAS' are up to date
    • any of: [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
      • check-success = integration-tests
      • check-neutral = integration-tests
      • check-skipped = integration-tests
    • any of: [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
      • check-success = build-test-images (frontend) / build-test-images
      • check-neutral = build-test-images (frontend) / build-test-images
      • check-skipped = build-test-images (frontend) / build-test-images

[matusdrobuliak66]

Thanks!

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud