🐛 Fix PO center invitations to include correct product info and links (🚨)

[pcrespov]

What do these changes do?

Fixes the issue where invitations created through the PO center upon approval lacked product details and always wrongly defaulted to linking to the same product (i.e. the default) instead of the correct one.

Related issue/s

• Reported by Mar in Mattermost during testing of the last deployment

How to test

🚨 In a deployment with multiple products

1. Submit an account request via the form (pre-registration)
2. Log in as a PO for that product and approve the request
3. Verify in the PO center:
   • Invitation info shows the correct link and associated product(s)
4. Verify the email content includes:
   • Correct logos/product details (product.vendor.ui)
   • Link to the product of origin (not the default)
5. Click the invitation link and complete the registration flow
6. Repeat the process with a different product within the same deployment

Dev-ops

• test in master for several products by @pcrespov
• test in staging for several products by @pcrespov
• test in production for several products

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 85.38%. Comparing base (656c83d) to head (194eea0).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #8261      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.04%   85.38%   -2.67%     
==========================================
  Files        1919      744    -1175     
  Lines       74341    34419   -39922     
  Branches     1305      175    -1130     
==========================================
- Hits        65453    29387   -36066     
+ Misses       8495     4975    -3520     
+ Partials      393       57     -336     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	64.28% <50.00%> (-0.03%)	⬇️
unittests	87.35% <100.00%> (+0.67%)	⬆️

Components	Coverage Δ
pkg_aws_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_celery_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_dask_task_models_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_models_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_notifications_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_postgres_database	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_service_integration	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_service_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_settings_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_simcore_sdk	76.84% <ø> (-8.20%)	⬇️
agent	∅ <ø> (∅)
api_server	∅ <ø> (∅)
autoscaling	∅ <ø> (∅)
catalog	∅ <ø> (∅)
clusters_keeper	∅ <ø> (∅)
dask_sidecar	∅ <ø> (∅)
datcore_adapter	∅ <ø> (∅)
director	∅ <ø> (∅)
director_v2	78.13% <ø> (-12.82%)	⬇️
dynamic_scheduler	∅ <ø> (∅)
dynamic_sidecar	87.19% <ø> (-2.91%)	⬇️
efs_guardian	∅ <ø> (∅)
invitations	∅ <ø> (∅)
payments	∅ <ø> (∅)
resource_usage_tracker	∅ <ø> (∅)
storage	∅ <ø> (∅)
webclient	∅ <ø> (∅)
webserver	88.12% <100.00%> (+0.01%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 656c83d...194eea0. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[mergify]

🧪 CI Insights

Here's what we observed from your CI run for 194eea0.

🟢 All jobs passed!

But CI Insights is watching 👀

[Copilot]

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

[odeimaiz]

thanks

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud