🎨 Batch api-server->wb-api-server requests in map endpoint in the api-server

[bisgaard-itis]

What do these changes do?

Motivated by https://git.speag.com/oSparc/osparc-infra/-/issues/incident/81, this PR batches rpc requests api-server -> wb-api-server to minimize the number of internal requests required to handle the map endpoint in the api-server.

• With these changes the number of requests api-server->wb-api-server performed when calling the map endpoint does not depend on the number of inputs passed.
• Previously the map endpoint in the api-server essentially had a loop around the run endpoint which meant that the number of RPC requests api-server->wb-api-server performed when a user called the map endpoint was #inputs*#(requests in run endpoint). With these changes and 🐛 Ensure function execute permission check is performed only once in map endpoint #8499 the number of requests will be #(requests in run endpoint).

Related issue/s

• https://git.speag.com/oSparc/osparc-infra/-/issues/incident/81

How to test

• This only modifies already existing endpoints in the webserver. Tests have been modified and enhanced accoordingly.

Dev-ops

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 85.71429% with 15 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 87.30%. Comparing base (a7cae35) to head (ee7bb37).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #8514      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   87.52%   87.30%   -0.22%     
==========================================
  Files        2009     1615     -394     
  Lines       78515    66250   -12265     
  Branches     1344     1005     -339     
==========================================
- Hits        68721    57842   -10879     
+ Misses       9392     8096    -1296     
+ Partials      402      312      -90     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	63.91% <18.57%> (-0.05%)	⬇️
unittests	85.78% <85.71%> (-0.46%)	⬇️

Components	Coverage Δ
pkg_aws_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_celery_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_dask_task_models_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_models_library	92.93% <100.00%> (+0.02%)	⬆️
pkg_notifications_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_postgres_database	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_service_integration	70.17% <ø> (ø)
pkg_service_library	70.96% <0.00%> (+0.01%)	⬆️
pkg_settings_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_simcore_sdk	84.95% <ø> (ø)
agent	93.10% <ø> (ø)
api_server	∅ <ø> (∅)
autoscaling	95.00% <ø> (ø)
catalog	92.06% <ø> (ø)
clusters_keeper	99.14% <ø> (ø)
dask_sidecar	92.38% <ø> (ø)
datcore_adapter	97.95% <ø> (ø)
director	75.72% <ø> (ø)
director_v2	90.95% <ø> (+0.05%)	⬆️
dynamic_scheduler	96.82% <0.00%> (ø)
dynamic_sidecar	90.44% <ø> (ø)
efs_guardian	89.83% <ø> (ø)
invitations	90.90% <ø> (ø)
payments	92.80% <ø> (ø)
resource_usage_tracker	92.11% <ø> (-0.11%)	⬇️
storage	∅ <ø> (∅)
webclient	∅ <ø> (∅)
webserver	87.09% <88.57%> (+0.01%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a7cae35...ee7bb37. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[mergify]

🧪 CI Insights

Here's what we observed from your CI run for ee7bb37.

❌ Job Failures

Pipeline	Job	Health on master	Retries	🔍 CI Insights	📄 Logs
CI	system-tests		0	View	View
	unit-tests		0	View	View

[pcrespov]

Thx.. Following our offline discussion, check the batch operations and see if you can reuse and even extend some of these concepts
tjhx

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
1 New issue
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud