⬆️ Upgrade UV to 0.9.x version everywhere

[sanderegg]

What do these changes do?

• Upgraded CI workflow for celery-library that was somehow still using old style installation code
• Upgraded UV version --> 0.9.x

Related issue/s

How to test

Dev-ops

[sanderegg]

@mergify queue

[mergify]

queue

🟠 Waiting for conditions to match

• -closed [📌 queue requirement]
• any of: [🔀 queue conditions]
  • all of: [📌 queue conditions of queue default]
    • branch-protection-review-decision = APPROVED [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
    • #approved-reviews-by >= 2 [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
    • #approved-reviews-by>=2
    • #changes-requested-reviews-by = 0 [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
    • #changes-requested-reviews-by=0
    • #review-threads-unresolved = 0 [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
    • #review-threads-unresolved=0
    • -conflict
    • -draft
    • base=master
    • label!=🤖-do-not-merge
    • label=🤖-automerge
    • any of: [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
      • check-skipped = deploy to dockerhub
      • check-neutral = deploy to dockerhub
      • check-success = deploy to dockerhub
    • any of: [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
      • check-success = system-tests
      • check-neutral = system-tests
      • check-skipped = system-tests
    • any of: [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
      • check-success = unit-tests
      • check-neutral = unit-tests
      • check-skipped = unit-tests
    • any of: [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
      • check-success = check OAS' are up to date
      • check-neutral = check OAS' are up to date
      • check-skipped = check OAS' are up to date
    • any of: [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
      • check-success = integration-tests
      • check-neutral = integration-tests
      • check-skipped = integration-tests
    • any of: [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
      • check-success = build-test-images (frontend) / build-test-images
      • check-neutral = build-test-images (frontend) / build-test-images
      • check-skipped = build-test-images (frontend) / build-test-images
    • any of: [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
      • check-success = SonarCloud Code Analysis
      • check-neutral = SonarCloud Code Analysis
      • check-skipped = SonarCloud Code Analysis
• -conflict [📌 queue requirement]
• -draft [📌 queue requirement]
• any of: [📌 queue -> configuration change requirements]
  • -mergify-configuration-changed
  • check-success = Configuration changed

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 89.47%. Comparing base (48dfd7c) to head (df4ec70).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #8519      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   87.56%   89.47%   +1.91%     
==========================================
  Files        2007     1701     -306     
  Lines       78313    67658   -10655     
  Branches     1343      642     -701     
==========================================
- Hits        68571    60540    -8031     
+ Misses       9340     6947    -2393     
+ Partials      402      171     -231     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	64.01% <ø> (+0.03%)	⬆️
unittests	87.98% <ø> (+1.70%)	⬆️

Components	Coverage Δ
pkg_aws_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_celery_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_dask_task_models_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_models_library	92.90% <ø> (ø)
pkg_notifications_library	85.20% <ø> (ø)
pkg_postgres_database	87.95% <ø> (ø)
pkg_service_integration	70.17% <ø> (ø)
pkg_service_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_settings_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_simcore_sdk	84.95% <ø> (ø)
agent	93.10% <ø> (ø)
api_server	91.76% <ø> (ø)
autoscaling	95.73% <ø> (ø)
catalog	92.06% <ø> (ø)
clusters_keeper	99.14% <ø> (ø)
dask_sidecar	91.82% <ø> (ø)
datcore_adapter	97.95% <ø> (ø)
director	75.72% <ø> (ø)
director_v2	90.98% <ø> (+0.09%)	⬆️
dynamic_scheduler	96.82% <ø> (ø)
dynamic_sidecar	90.44% <ø> (ø)
efs_guardian	89.83% <ø> (ø)
invitations	90.90% <ø> (ø)
payments	92.80% <ø> (ø)
resource_usage_tracker	92.27% <ø> (+0.10%)	⬆️
storage	86.82% <ø> (-0.05%)	⬇️
webclient	∅ <ø> (∅)
webserver	87.10% <ø> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 48dfd7c...df4ec70. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[mergify]

🧪 CI Insights

Here's what we observed from your CI run for df4ec70.

✅ Passed Jobs With Interesting Signals

Pipeline	Job	Signal	Health on master	Retries	🔍 CI Insights	📄 Logs
CI	system-tests	Base branch is broken, but retries were needed. Could be early signs of flakiness 👀		1	View	View
	unit-tests	Base branch is broken, but the job passed. Looks like this might be a real fix 💪		0	View	View

[giancarloromeo]

Thanks

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud