🐛Fix docker service custom constraints key type (⚠️ devops)

[sanderegg]

What do these changes do?

#8692 has set the wrong type for DIRECTOR_OSPARC_CUSTOM_DOCKER_PLACEMENT_CONSTRAINTS and DIRECTOR_V2_DYNAMIC_SIDECAR_OSPARC_CUSTOM_DOCKER_PLACEMENT_CONSTRAINTS, this fixes it.

Related issue/s

• closes Add autoscaling service per product to prevent mixing billable and not billable services to run on same machines #7819

How to test

Dev-ops

• STAGING https://git.speag.com/oSparc/osparc-ops-deployment-configuration/-/merge_requests/1742
• PRODUCTION https://git.speag.com/oSparc/osparc-ops-deployment-configuration/-/merge_requests/1743

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 68.68%. Comparing base (27f491d) to head (1dc5439).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (27f491d) and HEAD (1dc5439). Click for more details.

HEAD has 30 uploads less than BASE

Flag	BASE (27f491d)	HEAD (1dc5439)
unittests	32	2

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #8719       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   87.47%   68.68%   -18.80%     
===========================================
  Files        2018      796     -1222     
  Lines       79384    36596    -42788     
  Branches     1389      154     -1235     
===========================================
- Hits        69445    25135    -44310     
- Misses       9543    11412     +1869     
+ Partials      396       49      -347     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	63.91% <ø> (+0.04%)	⬆️
unittests	83.29% <ø> (-3.02%)	⬇️

Components	Coverage Δ
pkg_aws_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_celery_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_dask_task_models_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_models_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_notifications_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_postgres_database	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_service_integration	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_service_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_settings_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_simcore_sdk	75.36% <ø> (-9.10%)	⬇️
agent	∅ <ø> (∅)
api_server	∅ <ø> (∅)
autoscaling	∅ <ø> (∅)
catalog	∅ <ø> (∅)
clusters_keeper	∅ <ø> (∅)
dask_sidecar	∅ <ø> (∅)
datcore_adapter	∅ <ø> (∅)
director	75.45% <ø> (ø)
director_v2	91.19% <ø> (ø)
dynamic_scheduler	∅ <ø> (∅)
dynamic_sidecar	81.94% <ø> (-8.82%)	⬇️
efs_guardian	∅ <ø> (∅)
invitations	∅ <ø> (∅)
payments	∅ <ø> (∅)
resource_usage_tracker	∅ <ø> (∅)
storage	∅ <ø> (∅)
webclient	∅ <ø> (∅)
webserver	58.77% <ø> (-27.83%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 27f491d...1dc5439. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[sanderegg]

@mergify queue

[GitHK]

Please use a better PR title, thanks

[mergify]

queue

🛑 Configuration not compatible with a branch protection setting

Details

The branch protection setting Require branches to be up to date before merging is not compatible with draft PR checks. To keep this branch protection enabled, update your Mergify configuration to enable in-place checks: set merge_queue.max_parallel_checks: 1, set every queue rule batch_size: 1, and avoid two-step CI (make merge_conditions identical to queue_conditions). Otherwise, disable this branch protection.

[mergify]

Merge Queue Status

🛑 Queue command has been cancelled

[sanderegg]

Please use a better PR title, thanks

??? I guess you were slightly too fast, or me slightly too slow to change it... anyway... let me know if it is unclear.

[YuryHrytsuk]

nice typing!

[mergify]

🧪 CI Insights

Here's what we observed from your CI run for 1dc5439.

✅ Passed Jobs With Interesting Signals

Pipeline	Job	Signal	Health on master	Retries	🔍 CI Insights	📄 Logs
CI	unit-tests	You had a 50% chance of failing… lucky you! 🎲		Configure an automatic retry	View	View