Skip to content

Add Version Check workflow#68

Merged
lkdvos merged 3 commits intomainfrom
versioncheck
Mar 24, 2025
Merged

Add Version Check workflow#68
lkdvos merged 3 commits intomainfrom
versioncheck

Conversation

@lkdvos
Copy link
Collaborator

@lkdvos lkdvos commented Mar 24, 2025

This introduces a new workflow to check that the version in the Project file has been increased.

(not bumping version just yet as a proof of principle)

@lkdvos lkdvos requested a review from mtfishman March 24, 2025 19:48
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 24, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 85.00%. Comparing base (f154553) to head (7f9ab19).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #68   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   85.00%   85.00%           
=======================================
  Files           1        1           
  Lines          80       80           
=======================================
  Hits           68       68           
  Misses         12       12           
Flag Coverage Δ
docs 75.00% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@mtfishman
Copy link
Member

Very cool, thanks @lkdvos! Can you also add the workflow to the template?

@lkdvos
Copy link
Collaborator Author

lkdvos commented Mar 24, 2025

Thanks for the reminder, I actually did forget about that

@lkdvos lkdvos merged commit e85a673 into main Mar 24, 2025
13 checks passed
@lkdvos lkdvos deleted the versioncheck branch March 24, 2025 22:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants