Upgrade license from GPLv2 to GPLv2+ #1309
Closed
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This was easy because only README.md and doc/01-About.md were redacted manually, everything else via:
git ls-files -z |xargs -0 perl -pi -e 's/Icinga GmbH \| GPLv2/Icinga GmbH | GPLv2+/'This is legal because we have only merged PRs with label:cla/signed or made by Icinga staff: https://github.com/Icinga/icingadb-web/pulls?page=1&q=is%3Apr+is%3Aclosed+-label%3Acla%2Fsigned+-author%3Anilmerg
This has no risk for us in people distributing their own version under GPLv3 only. After all, we won't take their patches anyway, unless they sign our CLA.
This is the cleanest solution for having e.g. these in one address space:
Apropos, K8s Web is even v3-licensed on purpose, to have a stronger protection against cloud ops.