Add inline documentation for complex logic in type-checker (#73) #100
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
|
hey @ALIPHATICHYD please confirm that you've read this contribution guide and followed the steps on what to mention in your PR description. |
Author
Yes I confirm that I've read the guideline |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #73
Description
Added comprehensive documentation to type_checker.rs and symbol_table.rs to improve code readability and maintainability. The documentation explains the purpose, key functions, and usage patterns for both modules.
Specific Changes
Type
Testing
No tests added (documentation-only change)
AI-Generated Code
No AI-generated code in this PR.
Files Modified