feat: add queryRows function

[NguyenHoangSon96]

Closes #33

Proposed Changes

Add queryRows, which return row as a Map

Checklist

• CHANGELOG.md updated
• Rebased/mergeable
• A test has been added if appropriate
• Tests pass
• Commit messages are conventional
• Sign CLA (if not already signed)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.19%. Comparing base (27267a9) to head (be410b3).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #209      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   90.14%   90.19%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files          19       19              
  Lines        1126     1142      +16     
  Branches      177      178       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits         1015     1030      +15     
  Misses         41       41              
- Partials       70       71       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[NguyenHoangSon96]

@bednar
I ignored test cases for 2 lines. I think it's unnecessary
But please review and tell me if It's needed

[karel-rehor]

I've added comments requesting a few changes. The ones that I might insist upon are related to examples in javadoc comments, which seem to not show the method being documented. or otherwise appear to be broken.

It would be nice to extend testing.

• One or two unit tests for new methods would be nice
• The integration test could be more complete
• When testing integration it would be nice to test a couple of basic handled exceptional situations.

[NguyenHoangSon96]

@karel-rehor
The issues in the documents were my stupid mistakes; I forgot to edit the comment after copying it from query() function 😂
I edited the code, please check again
Thank you

[karel-rehor]

There are still some issues with the Javadoc examples. The arguments in many of the examples do not match the method they are documenting. Also, when looking at how the javadoc is rendered in Intellij, the formatting of the examples could be improved to be more easily readable.

[NguyenHoangSon96]

Hi @karel-rehor
I fixed the comments
Please check again 😊

[karel-rehor]

Looks Good. Sorry, it took me so long to get back to this. You might need to rebase this PR before merging.

[NguyenHoangSon96]

Looks Good. Sorry, it took me so long to get back to this. You might need to rebase this PR before merging.

Hi @karel-rehor
No problem
I have rebased the branch, please check again

[karel-rehor]

I don't see any significant changes following rebase. Still looks good to go.

[jansimonb]

LGTM, thanks! 👍