Skip to content

Conversation

@bguiz
Copy link

@bguiz bguiz commented Oct 29, 2025

Description

  • Markdown syntax/ formatting
  • so that it can render in mintlify

Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • added ! to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • followed the guidelines for building modules
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • included comments for documenting Go code
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • run make lint and make test
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic
  • reviewed API design and naming
  • reviewed documentation is accurate
  • reviewed tests and test coverage
  • manually tested (if applicable)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Improved formatting consistency across module documentation (circuit, crisis, governance, and group modules) for enhanced readability and clarity.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 29, 2025

Walkthrough

Documentation formatting updates across four module README files in x/circuit, x/crisis, x/gov, and x/group. Event attribute values and code references are now consistently wrapped with backticks for improved code formatting presentation. No logic or functional changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation Formatting
x/circuit/README.md, x/crisis/README.md, x/gov/README.md, x/group/README.md
Event attribute values (e.g., {granterAddress}, {proposalID}, group_id) and code references are now wrapped with backticks for consistent code-style formatting throughout Events tables and examples.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

  • All changes are purely cosmetic documentation formatting with no code logic modifications
  • Consistent pattern applied uniformly across all four README files
  • No behavioral, functional, or structural code changes to review

Poem

🐰 With whiskers twitched and paws held high,
The docs now sparkle, formatted spry!
From backticks bright, a sight so neat,
These READMEs make documentation sweet.

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The pull request title "docs: synatx for markdown to use backticks for attribute values in ta…" directly and specifically describes the main change in the changeset. All four modified README files (circuit, crisis, gov, and group) have been updated to use backticks for formatting attribute values in tables, which aligns perfectly with what the title communicates. The title is concise, uses the conventional "docs:" prefix for documentation changes, and avoids vague language or unnecessary noise. It clearly conveys the primary purpose of the PR to a reviewer scanning the commit history.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix/backticks-for-attribute-values-in-tables

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a04d582 and b638179.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • x/circuit/README.md (2 hunks)
  • x/crisis/README.md (1 hunks)
  • x/gov/README.md (4 hunks)
  • x/group/README.md (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
x/group/README.md (1)

521-590: Backtick formatting for event attributes looks good.

The wrapping of attribute values in backticks across all event tables is consistently applied and appropriate for code-style presentation in Mintlify. No issues detected.

x/crisis/README.md (1)

71-82: Backtick formatting is consistent and correct.

Event attribute values and the JSON example are properly wrapped in backticks for code presentation. All changes align with the Mintlify formatting objective.

x/gov/README.md (2)

583-655: Event attribute and parameter values are consistently formatted with backticks.

The backtick wrapping across the Events and Parameters sections is correctly and uniformly applied. This will improve code presentation in Mintlify.


1551-1551: Dismiss review comment — Mintlify supports this syntax.

Mintlify accepts MDX/JSX-style comments {/* ... */} in Markdown at the top (base) level of a document. The comments at lines 1551 and 2232 use valid syntax and will be properly hidden; no conversion to HTML comments is required.

Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.

x/circuit/README.md (2)

140-162: Event attribute values correctly wrapped in backticks.

The attribute values across all message events are consistently and correctly formatted with backticks for code presentation in Mintlify.


65-65: No changes needed—Mintlify supports JSX-style comment syntax.

Mintlify uses an MDX-style parser and supports JSX-style comments {/* ... */} in markdown files, including at the document base level. The syntax on line 65 is valid and will not render as literal text.

Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@bangjelkoski bangjelkoski merged commit 94abda2 into v0.50.x-inj Oct 29, 2025
45 of 46 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants