Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jul 25, 2025. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@jack-rep
Copy link

@jack-rep jack-rep commented Apr 29, 2025

The docs here use the Cosmos default of 9090: https://docs.injective.network/nodes/validators/mainnet/peggo

We had an issue of using 9900, switching it to 9090 solved it. Updating docs to reflect it.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated the default value for the --cosmos-grpc option in the README for relevant commands to reflect the new default port (tcp://localhost:9090).

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 29, 2025

Walkthrough

The README documentation was updated to reflect a change in the default value for the --cosmos-grpc option in the peggo orchestrator and peggo tx register-eth-key commands. The default endpoint was changed from tcp://localhost:9900 to tcp://localhost:9090. No other modifications to the documentation or codebase were made.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
README.md Updated the default value for --cosmos-grpc from tcp://localhost:9900 to tcp://localhost:9090 in command documentation.

Poem

A hop and a skip, the port has changed,
From ninety-nine hundred, to ninety-nine arranged!
Now nine-oh-nine-oh is where you’ll connect,
The docs are updated, as you’d expect.
With every small tweak, our journey goes on,
Let’s follow the ports—hop, hop, and hop on! 🐇


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0ff7aa1 and 3eea125.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
README.md (1)

66-66:

Details

✅ Verification successful

Documentation update: default gRPC port corrected to 9090
The default endpoint for the --cosmos-grpc flag in the peggo orchestrator command was updated from tcp://localhost:9900 to tcp://localhost:9090, aligning with the Cosmos standard port.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify no remaining references to the old gRPC port 9900 in the README
rg -n "9900" README.md

Length of output: 22


No remaining ‘9900’ references in README; port update approved
Verified that the default endpoint for --cosmos-grpc now uses tcp://localhost:9090 and a search for “9900” in README.md returned no hits.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@jack-rep jack-rep marked this pull request as ready for review April 29, 2025 16:43
@achilleas-kal achilleas-kal requested a review from dbrajovic April 29, 2025 16:44
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants