Fix typos in uniquify.go, eip712_cosmos.go, typed_data.go, and chain.go#282
Fix typos in uniquify.go, eip712_cosmos.go, typed_data.go, and chain.go#282Pronoss wants to merge 5 commits intoInjectiveLabs:masterfrom Pronoss:fix/typos
uniquify.go, eip712_cosmos.go, typed_data.go, and chain.go#282Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request encompasses minor improvements across several files in the codebase, focusing on documentation clarity, logging precision, and a new transaction wrapping method. The changes include a log message correction in the chain client, a new EIP712 transaction wrapping function, a documentation typo fix in a uniquify utility, and a minor comment update in a typed data module. These modifications aim to enhance code readability and provide an alternative method for EIP712 transaction handling. Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant ChainClient
participant EIP712Wrapper
Client->>ChainClient: BroadcastMsg
ChainClient-->>Client: Improved Error Logging
Client->>EIP712Wrapper: WrapTxToEIP712V2
EIP712Wrapper-->>Client: Wrapped Transaction Data
Possibly related PRs
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
eip712_cosmos.go (1)
478-478: Consider a narrower lint ignore scope.
By disabling all gocritic checks for this line, you might inadvertently overlook useful warnings or suggested improvements. If you only mean to suppress a specific gocritic check, adjusting the directive to target that check would be more precise and safer.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
client/chain/chain.go(1 hunks)eip712_cosmos.go(1 hunks)ethereum/util/uniquify.go(1 hunks)typeddata/typed_data.go(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- ethereum/util/uniquify.go
- typeddata/typed_data.go
- client/chain/chain.go
aarmoa
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't see the reason for submitting a PR without any functional change in it
|
We don't accept PR just changing comments pointing to the master branch |
chain.go:messagess→messagesin an error log.eip712_cosmos.go&typed_data.go:defered→deferredin comments.uniquify.go:Multilpe→Multipleandsequentally→sequentiallyin a function description.Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Improvements
WrapTxToEIP712V2function