Project Resumed #98
Project Resumed #98
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to the project's README.md, primarily focusing on updating the project's community engagement approach and licensing information. The changes remove a statement about product development being on hold and replace it with an invitation for contributors. The licensing section has been simplified to reference only the GOFL license, removing the previous mention of GPL-v3. Changes
Poem
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Here's the code health analysis summary for commits Analysis Summary
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
README.md (2)
6-7: Consider aligning the help request with project statusWhile the call for contributors is great, consider mentioning that this is a learning/experimental project (as stated in the Note section below) to set proper expectations for potential contributors.
-**Help needed**: I am looking for contributors to help me with this project. If you are interested, please let me know. +**Help needed**: I am looking for contributors to help with this experimental project aimed at learning HTTP internals. If you're interested in exploring how HTTP works under the hood, please let me know.
97-97: Fix grammar in license nameThe term "softwares" is incorrect in standard English.
-This project is licensed under GOFL (Global Opensource softwares Free License) - see the [LICENSE](LICENSE.md) file for details. +This project is licensed under GOFL (Global Open Source Software Free License) - see the [LICENSE](LICENSE.md) file for details.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[grammar] ~97-~97: In standard English, the noun “softwares” is uncountable. Consider using an alternative.
Context: ... licensed under GOFL (Global Opensource softwares Free License) - see the [LICENSE](LICEN...(SOFTWARES)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
README.md(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md
[grammar] ~97-~97: In standard English, the noun “softwares” is uncountable. Consider using an alternative.
Context: ... licensed under GOFL (Global Opensource softwares Free License) - see the [LICENSE](LICEN...
(SOFTWARES)
| ### LICENSE | ||
|
|
||
| This project is licensed under GOFL (Global Opensource softwares Free License) and GPL-v3 (General Public License) - see the [LICENSE](LICENSE.md) file for details. | ||
| This project is licensed under GOFL (Global Opensource softwares Free License) - see the [LICENSE](LICENSE.md) file for details. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Consider using a standard OSI-approved license for better adoption
The current GOFL license, while comprehensive, is not a standard OSI-approved license. This could create several concerns:
- The license is not legally vetted or widely recognized, which may deter potential contributors and users
- Some organizations have policies that only allow the use of OSI-approved licenses
- The license contains unconventional terms like "GLWTS (Good Luck With That Shit)" which may not be suitable for professional use
- The governing law section refers to "Global Open Source Softwares" which is not a recognized legal entity
- The license revocation clause creates uncertainty as it allows the author to revoke the license, which is uncommon in open source
Consider switching to a widely-used OSI-approved license such as:
- MIT License (permissive)
- Apache License 2.0 (permissive with patent protection)
- GNU GPL v3 (copyleft)
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify license file and consider using a standard license
GOFL is not a widely recognized open-source license. This might create confusion or hesitation among potential contributors. Consider using a standard OSI-approved license like MIT, Apache, or GPL.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if LICENSE.md exists and contains GOFL details
if [ -f LICENSE.md ]; then
echo "LICENSE.md content:"
cat LICENSE.md
else
echo "WARNING: LICENSE.md file not found"
fi
# Check for any other license files
fd -g "LICENSE*"
Length of output: 10899
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[grammar] ~97-~97: In standard English, the noun “softwares” is uncountable. Consider using an alternative.
Context: ... licensed under GOFL (Global Opensource softwares Free License) - see the [LICENSE](LICEN...
(SOFTWARES)
Summary by CodeRabbit