Skip to content

Conversation

@carlostome
Copy link
Collaborator

@carlostome carlostome commented Jan 14, 2026

Description

Closes #1031.

Blocked by #1030.

Checklist

  • Commit sequence broadly makes sense and commits have useful messages
  • Any semantic changes to the specifications are documented in CHANGELOG.md
  • Code is formatted according to CONTRIBUTING.md
  • Self-reviewed the diff

@williamdemeo williamdemeo force-pushed the 1031-dijkstra-utxo-check-that-tx-inputs-exist-both-in-the-original-utxo-and-the-evolving-utxo branch from 76f7b8e to 7844329 Compare January 15, 2026 03:44
Copy link
Member

@williamdemeo williamdemeo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. Nice work!

@carlostome carlostome merged commit 7659da8 into master Jan 15, 2026
33 checks passed
@carlostome carlostome deleted the 1031-dijkstra-utxo-check-that-tx-inputs-exist-both-in-the-original-utxo-and-the-evolving-utxo branch January 15, 2026 15:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Dijkstra] UTXO: Check that tx inputs exist both in the original utxo and the evolving utxo

3 participants