Merged
Conversation
ccreghotccreghot
plus many mods required to reconcile and type-check the result of merge conflict resolution
Member
|
@teodanciu I did my best to rebase this very old PR and reconcile the conflicts and then revise the resulting merge so that it type-checks. However, I think @WhatisRT should probably have a look at it again before we merge so that he can make sure I haven't messed it up or reverted any changes that he wants to keep. In the meantime, you can run your conformance tests off the MAlonzo branch that gets generated from this branch once the CI passes. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Closes #490. We only want to merge this once conformance tests can detect this test failing.
Checklist