Skip to content

Conversation

@carlostome
Copy link
Collaborator

@carlostome carlostome commented Nov 10, 2025

Checklist

  • Commit sequence broadly makes sense and commits have useful messages
  • Any semantic changes to the specifications are documented in CHANGELOG.md
  • Code is formatted according to CONTRIBUTING.md
  • Self-reviewed the diff

@carlostome carlostome force-pushed the carlos/allow-custom-class-deriving-haskell+cleanup branch from f4c29c6 to ad992db Compare November 10, 2025 17:11
Copy link
Member

@williamdemeo williamdemeo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not entirely sure what the problem was, but I'm also not opposed to any of these changes, so go ahead and merge if they resolve the issue.

@carlostome carlostome force-pushed the carlos/allow-custom-class-deriving-haskell+cleanup branch from ad992db to c1b39dc Compare November 11, 2025 08:56
@carlostome carlostome merged commit 9ddc5bd into master Nov 11, 2025
14 checks passed
@carlostome carlostome deleted the carlos/allow-custom-class-deriving-haskell+cleanup branch November 11, 2025 09:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants