Skip to content

Conversation

@BCSharp
Copy link
Member

@BCSharp BCSharp commented Feb 1, 2025

Followup on #1828 (comment). In light of proposal #1887 I don't think it is worthwhile to spend effort on those two legacy operator implementations beyond of what was already supported.

Copy link
Contributor

@slozier slozier left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@slozier slozier merged commit e3272b9 into IronLanguages:main Feb 1, 2025
8 checks passed
@BCSharp BCSharp deleted the array_base1_op branch February 1, 2025 16:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants