Address feedback from review on refactor changes

[Copilot]

The test_iteration_status_emails_workflow.py test file used TestSecurityBestPractices instead of the expected TestWorkflowSecurity class name and was missing the required TestEdgeCases class, causing cross-file consistency test failures.

Changes:

• Renamed TestSecurityBestPractices → TestWorkflowSecurity to match naming convention across workflow test files
• Added TestEdgeCases class with standard edge case validations:
  • YAML formatting (tabs, indentation)
  • Duplicate detection (job names, step IDs)
  • Step validation (empty steps, missing uses/run)
  • YAML parseability

These class names are enforced by test_cross_file_consistency.py which validates that all workflow test files follow the same structure.

---

✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.

---

Summary by cubic

Applies review feedback on the refactor in #171 to improve clarity and reliability. Renames the security tests to TestWorkflowSecurity and adds TestEdgeCases for YAML formatting, duplicate job names, unique step IDs, non-empty steps, and parseability.

^{Written for commit 13bf82c. Summary will update on new commits.}

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

• ✅ Full review completed - (🔄 Check again to review again)

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[cubic-dev-ai]

No issues found across 1 file

[JaclynCodes]

@copilot https://github.com/copilot/tasks/pull/PR_kwDOPRtU-86_MPcA?session_id=90991779-51db-4e91-9c96-bcd38363339b