Skip to content

Conversation

olivierlabayle
Copy link
Collaborator

@olivierlabayle olivierlabayle commented May 27, 2025

Addresses: #160

changes f_tol to f_reltol (not f_abstol) which is the non-breaking change according to the log message.

@olivierlabayle olivierlabayle requested a review from tlienart May 27, 2025 12:50
Copy link
Member

@ablaom ablaom left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay, this looks good to me. Thanks for stepping up here @olivierlabayle.

Since the docs make it clear that we are just passing options to Optim I agree it's fair not to tag this as breaking.

I'd like to @tlienart to have an opportunity to review. @olivierlabayle Can you ping me in two weeks if we get no further comment and you need me to merge?

@tlienart
Copy link
Collaborator

tlienart commented May 29, 2025

This makes sense to me, thanks both!! I'll merge but @ablaom if I could leave the release process to you that would be great 🙏🏼

Co-authored-by: Anthony Blaom, PhD <[email protected]>
@tlienart tlienart merged commit 03ca32c into dev May 29, 2025
4 checks passed
This was referenced May 29, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants