Skip to content

Conversation

@IanButterworth
Copy link
Member

@IanButterworth IanButterworth commented Dec 22, 2025

Closes #55

This is a bit of an experiment to see how far feature, performance and test parity can get with modern julia..

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 22, 2025

Welcome to Codecov 🎉

Once you merge this PR into your default branch, you're all set! Codecov will compare coverage reports and display results in all future pull requests.

Thanks for integrating Codecov - We've got you covered ☂️

@IanButterworth IanButterworth force-pushed the ib/julia branch 4 times, most recently from 13dfe2c to 0c4f366 Compare December 22, 2025 00:20
Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>
IanButterworth and others added 6 commits December 21, 2025 19:38
Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>
Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>
Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>
Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>
@ericphanson
Copy link
Member

Btw JuliaWeb/GitHub.jl#233 may be important here if the python stuff we were using was handling rate limiting for us

Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>
@arnavk23
Copy link
Collaborator

arnavk23 commented Jan 2, 2026

Also look through https://github.com/cadojo/ExperimentalTagBot.jl, it is a minimum viable Tagbot implementation in Julia

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Rewrite TagBot in Julia (long-term goal)

4 participants