Feature/trim compatible

[el-oso]

Attempt to make it trim compatible. I am not sure if I am missing something.
Assumed this is a draft PR

[chriselrod]

It's hard to evaluate such a large diff.
Note the .JuliaFormatter.toml in the base repo seems to be ignored by however you're formatting.

But I may hand over the reigns completely here, so whatever new governance can decide on different formatting policies. If so, they should still do it in two steps: one PR is formatting only, the other can be separate changes.

[el-oso]

You are right, forgot to use JuliaFormatter .
I am testing Runic.
The diff is basically that I remove the @evals and made @generated functions instead.
I also commented a lot of stuff because I am not sure what is the rationale behind it.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 26 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 0.48%. Comparing base (10e48a2) to head (f571858).
⚠️ Report is 23 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/x86.jl	0.00%	25 Missing ⚠️
src/CPUSummary.jl	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #30       +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   16.74%   0.48%   -16.27%     
==========================================
  Files           5       4        -1     
  Lines         209     208        -1     
==========================================
- Hits           35       1       -34     
- Misses        174     207       +33     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[el-oso]

Already addressed by this PR #31