Skip to content

Test JSOBenchmarks with SolverBenchmarks#308

Closed
MaxenceGollier wants to merge 1 commit intoJuliaSmoothOptimizers:jso-bmarksfrom
MaxenceGollier:benchmark-pr
Closed

Test JSOBenchmarks with SolverBenchmarks#308
MaxenceGollier wants to merge 1 commit intoJuliaSmoothOptimizers:jso-bmarksfrom
MaxenceGollier:benchmark-pr

Conversation

@MaxenceGollier
Copy link
Collaborator

DO NOT MERGE

@MaxenceGollier MaxenceGollier added the run benchmarks Used to trigger benchmarks in a PR label Mar 7, 2026
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 7, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (jso-bmarks@7aeb80f). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files
@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             jso-bmarks     #308   +/-   ##
=============================================
  Coverage              ?   83.51%           
=============================================
  Files                 ?       13           
  Lines                 ?     1656           
  Branches              ?        0           
=============================================
  Hits                  ?     1383           
  Misses                ?      273           
  Partials              ?        0           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@MaxenceGollier
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hmmm, maybe the problem comes from the fact that the target branch is in another fork... I think there's a similar issue with PkgBenchmark.jl, it looks like the problem comes from the Gist. Anyway, opened another one with a local branch: #309

Will close this one for now...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

run benchmarks Used to trigger benchmarks in a PR

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant