Skip to content

Conversation

@ChrisRackauckas-Claude
Copy link

Summary

  • Fixed domain mismatch error in ComplexExtensionDerivation constructor that prevented trigonometric functions like sin(x) from being integrated using the Risch method
  • Made the domain compatibility check more flexible to handle complex nested field structures created during complexification
  • Resolves issue trigonometric functions with risch method are working? #20 where integrate(sin(x), x, RischMethod()) was failing with "base ring of domain must be domain of D" error

Changes Made

Modified the ComplexExtensionDerivation constructor in /src/methods/risch/complex_fields.jl to:

  • Replace rigid domain equality check with flexible compatibility checking
  • Handle different nesting structures (FracField, PolyRing combinations)
  • Provide better error messages with expected vs actual domain information

Test Plan

  • Verified the error was occurring at line 7 of complex_fields.jl
  • Analyzed the domain structure mismatch in field hierarchy construction
  • Implemented flexible domain compatibility checking
  • Created test case to verify integrate(sin(x), x, RischMethod()) works
  • Run full test suite to ensure no regressions

Technical Details

The issue occurred because when TowerOfDifferentialFields processes trigonometric functions, it calls Complexify(K, D) which creates a residue field kI = residue_field(kz, I^2+1)[1] with nested structure ResField{P} where P<:PolyRingElem{T}. The original check base_ring(base_ring(base_ring(domain)))==D.domain was too strict and didn't account for the various field nesting patterns that can occur.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Fixed domain mismatch error in ComplexExtensionDerivation constructor.
The issue was that the strict domain compatibility check was too rigid
for the complex nested field structures created during complexification
of trigonometric function integration.

The fix makes the domain compatibility check more flexible by handling
different nesting structures that can occur with fraction fields and
polynomial rings.

Fixes JuliaSymbolics#20
Added comprehensive test for Issue JuliaSymbolics#20 to verify that:
- sin(x) and cos(x) can be integrated with RischMethod() without errors
- Results are properly computed and returned as symbolic expressions
- Domain compatibility issues are resolved

The test is integrated into the main test suite under the Risch method tests.
Updated tests to verify that integrals produce mathematically correct results:
- ∫sin(x)dx derivative should equal sin(x)
- ∫cos(x)dx derivative should equal cos(x)
- ∫tan(x)dx derivative should equal tan(x)

This ensures the Risch method not only runs without errors but produces
the correct mathematical results that calculus expects.
Replaced complex domain matching logic with cleaner approach using
try-catch for base ring unwrapping. This should be more robust and
less prone to compilation issues while still fixing the original
domain mismatch error for trigonometric function integration.
Root cause analysis revealed that ComplexExtensionDerivation was using
a rigid domain check that didn't account for different nesting levels
of derivation domains, similar to how ExtensionDerivation handles
multiple constructor patterns.

Fixed by:
- Following the same pattern as ExtensionDerivation constructors
- Checking compatibility at multiple nesting levels
- Removing try-catch workarounds in favor of proper domain matching

Updated tests to verify mathematical correctness using derivative
verification based on the fundamental theorem of calculus.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants