Skip to content

Conversation

@christiangnrd
Copy link
Contributor

Is this too cursed? The interface would be that custom runtest (or execute after #51) functions would use @remote_testset instead of @testset.

If we go this route I'll add tests.

Close #32

@vchuravy
Copy link
Member

@christiangnrd I didn't see this PR until I had already written #55
I have a slight preference over my variant since we don't need a new macro.

I am still missing the "failed at" print, but that should be a relatively straightforward scan over the results.

@christiangnrd
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing in favour of #55

@christiangnrd christiangnrd deleted the pts branch October 17, 2025 13:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Retain precise testset information in failed tests

2 participants