Conversation
git push -f origin feature/meeting-scheduler qa :wq :wq
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hello @kamchettysadhika, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
This pull request introduces a comprehensive suite of tools and scripts aimed at automating and enriching the process of handling meeting transcripts. The core functionality revolves around processing Panopto video transcripts, extracting key information and action items using AI (GPT), analyzing related codebases and GitHub activity, generating tailored recommendations for AI coding assistants (like Cursor and Copilot), and automating the scheduling of follow-up collaboration meetings via Google Calendar, complete with email reminders. The changes span multiple new Python files implementing distinct stages of this pipeline and modifications to existing files to integrate these new components and update dependencies (like the OpenAI SDK).
Highlights
- Transcript Processing & AI Enrichment: New scripts (
minutesToJson.py,gpt_recommendations.py,contextual_enrichment.py) are added/modified to parse meeting transcripts, extract topics, action items, and generate code/research recommendations using OpenAI and external sources (arXiv). - Codebase Analysis & Matching: A new
Transcript_to_code.pyscript is introduced to analyze local or GitHub code repositories, extract functions, and semantically match them to topics discussed in the meeting transcript using TF-IDF and AI-generated reasoning. - AI Assistant Integration: The new
cursor.pyscript provides functionality to analyze a codebase for potential improvements (complexity, type hints, docs, etc.) and generate structured recommendations formatted for AI assistants like Cursor and GitHub Copilot. - GitHub Collaboration Analysis: A new
github_Auth.pyscript is added to interact with the GitHub API, analyze commit history, map file contributions to authors, detect potential conflicts, and provide insights into collaboration patterns. - Automated Calendar Scheduling: Scripts (
parser.py,generate_meeting_payloads.py,send_payloads.py) are added/modified to extract structured tasks from meeting summaries, use AI to identify necessary coordination meetings between individuals, generate Google Calendar event payloads, schedule events via the Google Calendar API (handling conflicts), and send email reminders. - Utility Scripts & Data: Several utility scripts (
jsontoexcel.py,match_names_to_emails.py,send_test_email.py,run_pipeline.py,run_pipeline_and_schedule.py,sample.py) and data files (name_email_map.json,calendar_payloads.json,github_collaboration_recommendations.json,github_commit_summary.json,output/sent_cache.json) are added or updated to support the new pipeline steps, data handling, and testing.
Changelog
Click here to see the changelog
- Email Integration/Email.py
- Added a new main script to sequentially run other Python scripts in the pipeline.
- Email Integration/Transcript_to_code.py
- Added a new script for matching transcript topics to code functions using AI (TF-IDF, ChatGPT) and extracting code from local or GitHub repositories.
- Includes classes for TranscriptTopic, CodeBlock, CodeMatch, TranscriptCodeMatcher, GitHubCodeExtractor, and LocalCodeExtractor.
- Implements logic for extracting topics, computing similarity, generating match reasoning, and creating a formatted report.
- Email Integration/code_specific_recommendations.py
- Added a new script to generate code library and optimization recommendations based on meeting summaries using GPT-4.
- Email Integration/contextual_enrichment.py
- Added a new script to enrich meeting topics by fetching relevant arXiv papers and generating implementation suggestions using GPT-4.
- Includes functionality to fetch GitHub tutorial links.
- Email Integration/cursor.py
- Added a new script to analyze a Python codebase for issues and opportunities (complexity, type hints, docs, async, tests).
- Generates structured recommendations for AI assistants like Cursor and GitHub Copilot.
- Includes functions to export recommendations as Cursor rules, Copilot prompts, and VS Code tasks.
- Email Integration/github_Auth.py
- Added a new script to interact with the GitHub API.
- Analyzes commit history to map file contributions to authors.
- Detects potential conflicts and computes collaboration overlaps.
- Provides role-based collaboration analysis and prints insights.
- Email Integration/jsontoexcel.py
- Added a new script to parse the markdown report generated by
Transcript_to_code.pyand convert it into an Excel file using pandas.
- Added a new script to parse the markdown report generated by
- Email Integration/minutesToJson.py
- Modified to orchestrate the execution of
fullpipeline.pyand subsequent enrichment steps. - Parses the output markdown, groups data by speaker, and calls functions from
gpt_recommendations.py,contextual_enrichment.py, andcode_specific_recommendations.pyfor enrichment. - Saves normalized, grouped, and enriched data to JSON files, including a final combined payload.
- Modified to orchestrate the execution of
- Email Integration/sample.py
- Added a simple script to list Google Generative AI models, likely for testing API access.
- calendarAuth.py
- Updated the
redirect_urisin the Google OAuth flow configuration tohttp://localhost:8081.
- Updated the
- calendar_payloads.json
- File content reset to an empty JSON array
[].
- File content reset to an empty JSON array
- fullpipeline.py
- Added a check (lines 679-682) to ensure a Panopto URL is provided as a command-line argument and exits if missing.
- generate_meeting_payloads.py
- Modified to use the new OpenAI SDK (
client.chat.completions.create). - Loads the name-email map from
name_email_map.json. - Reads the latest meeting summaries markdown and uses GPT-4 to identify potential collaboration meetings and generate calendar event payloads.
- Saves the generated payloads to
output/calendar_payloads.json.
- Modified to use the new OpenAI SDK (
- github_collaboration_recommendations.json
- File content reset to an empty JSON object
{}.
- File content reset to an empty JSON object
- github_commit_summary.json
- File content updated with sample commit summary data for 'Sihcaep'.
- match_names_to_emails.py
- Added a new script to read meeting summaries markdown, extract names using regex, and match them against the
name_email_map.json.
- Added a new script to read meeting summaries markdown, extract names using regex, and match them against the
- name_email_map.json
- File content updated with a large JSON object mapping numerous names to email addresses.
- output/calendar_payloads.json
- File content updated with a sample calendar event payload for a collaboration meeting.
- output/sent_cache.json
- File content reset to an empty JSON array
[].
- File content reset to an empty JSON array
- parser.py
- Modified to read meeting summaries markdown (from argument or latest output file).
- Extracts structured tasks starting with '- [ ]'.
- De-duplicates tasks based on name and task description.
- Uses GPT-4 to determine if pairs of individuals with tasks should coordinate.
- Adds a check to prevent self-pairing.
- Generates calendar event payloads for recommended coordination meetings and saves them to
output/calendar_payloads.json.
- parser12.py
- Modified (similar to
parser.py) to read markdown, extract tasks, and use GPT-4 for coordination pairing and payload generation. - Includes debug print statements.
- Modified (similar to
- run_pipeline.py
- Added a new script to orchestrate the full pipeline execution: runs
fullpipeline.py, waits for markdown output, runsparser.py, and then runssend_payloads.py.
- Added a new script to orchestrate the full pipeline execution: runs
- run_pipeline_and_schedule.py
- Added a new script providing two modes for running the pipeline: using a local test markdown file or running the full Panopto pipeline (
fullpipeline.py->generate_meeting_payloads.py). - Runs
send_payloads.pyafter payload generation.
- Added a new script providing two modes for running the pipeline: using a local test markdown file or running the full Panopto pipeline (
- send_payloads.py
- Modified to load calendar event payloads from
output/calendar_payloads.json. - Uses Google Calendar API (via OAuth) to schedule events, checking attendee free/busy status.
- Implements a fallback mechanism to reschedule if conflicts are found.
- Includes RSVP polling and sends email reminders using SMTP for attendees who haven't responded.
- Normalizes 'title' key to 'summary' in input event data.
- Requires sender email and app password for reminders.
- Modified to load calendar event payloads from
- send_test_email.py
- Added a simple script to send a test email using SMTP, likely for verifying email sending functionality.
- speaker_summary_utils.py
- Minor updates to
compute_text_similarity,enhance_speaker_tracking,generate_enhanced_speaker_summary_html,generate_enhanced_speaker_summary_markdown, andgenerate_speaker_summaries_data. - Removed
openai.api_key = api_keycalls, likely adapting to the new OpenAI SDK usage. - Minor whitespace adjustments.
- Minor updates to
- xlsx2html.py
- Removed
openai.api_key = api_keyfromsummarize_batchfunction, likely adapting to the new OpenAI SDK usage.
- Removed
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces significant new functionality for email integration, including transcript-to-code matching, GitHub analysis, and calendar scheduling based on meeting summaries. The code is ambitious and attempts to integrate several complex components.
However, the review identified several critical and high-severity issues, particularly concerning security (hardcoded credentials), correctness (logic errors, fragile parsing, hardcoded paths), and maintainability (hardcoded configuration). These issues need to be addressed before the code can be considered for merging.
The code also contains medium-severity issues related to robustness, flexibility, and adherence to standard practices (like using async correctly). Addressing these would significantly improve the quality and reliability of the system.
For Python code, I've referenced common practices, aligning with principles found in PEP 8.
Summary of Findings
- Hardcoded Sensitive Credentials: Email sender credentials (email address and app password) are hardcoded in
send_payloads.pyandsend_test_email.py. This is a critical security vulnerability and should be addressed immediately by loading these from environment variables or a secure configuration source. - Hardcoded Local File Path: The input file path in
jsontoexcel.pyis hardcoded to a specific path on a local machine, making the script unusable elsewhere. This should be provided via command-line arguments. - Critical Logic Error in
parser12.py: The parsing loop inparser12.pyis incorrectly structured, causing it to only process the last action item found in the markdown file instead of all of them. - Fragile Regex Parsing: Several scripts (
Transcript_to_code.py,cursor.py,jsontoexcel.py,parser.py,parser12.py) rely on regular expressions to parse structured or semi-structured text (code syntax, markdown reports, action item lines). This approach is fragile and highly susceptible to breaking if the input format changes slightly. Using dedicated parsing libraries or processing structured data directly would be more robust. - Synchronous I/O in Async Context: The
TranscriptCodeMatcherclass inTranscript_to_code.pyis async but uses the synchronousrequestslibrary for GitHub API calls, which blocks the event loop and negates the benefits of async programming. Use an async-compatible HTTP library likeaiohttporhttpx. - Hardcoded Configuration Values: Several scripts contain hardcoded configuration values such as GitHub repository details, author roles, API models/temperatures, preferred meeting times, redirect URIs, time zones, and directory paths. These should be made configurable via environment variables or a dedicated configuration file to improve maintainability and reusability.
- Logic Error in
fullpipeline.py: Redundant and conflicting logic for parsing the Panopto URL argument exists infullpipeline.py. - Limited Name Parsing: The regex for extracting names in
match_names_to_emails.pyand the name splitting logic inparser.py/parser12.pyare limited and may not handle all name formats or lists of names correctly. - Basic Rate Limiting: The GitHub API rate limiting implementation in
Transcript_to_code.pyis basic and could be improved for better robustness and efficiency. - Missing OpenAI API Error Handling: Some functions calling the OpenAI API (
code_specific_recommendations.py,contextual_enrichment.py) lack explicit error handling for API failures or invalid responses. - Simplified Dependency Tracking: The function dependency tracking in
cursor.pyis a simplified string-based approach that is not fully accurate.
Merge Readiness
This pull request introduces valuable features but contains critical and high-severity issues, particularly regarding security and correctness. The hardcoded credentials, local file paths, and logic errors must be fixed before merging. The reliance on fragile regex parsing and the incorrect use of synchronous I/O in async contexts also pose significant risks to the system's reliability and performance. I am unable to approve this pull request. Please address the identified issues and request reviews from other maintainers.
| from_email = "kamchettysadhika10@gmail.com" | ||
| app_password = "dewh lzfu ztee uoum" # Replace with your 16-digit app password |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hardcoding sensitive credentials like email addresses and app passwords directly in the source code is a critical security vulnerability. These credentials should be loaded from environment variables or a secure configuration management system and never committed to version control.
| from_email = "kamchettysadhika10@gmail.com" | |
| app_password = "dewh lzfu ztee uoum" # Replace with your 16-digit app password | |
| from_email = os.getenv("TEST_SENDER_EMAIL") | |
| app_password = os.getenv("TEST_APP_PASSWORD") # Replace with your 16-digit app password |
| SENDER_EMAIL = "your_email@gmail.com" # <--- CHANGE THIS | ||
| APP_PASSWORD = "your_app_password" # <--- AND THIS |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hardcoding sensitive credentials like email addresses and app passwords directly in the source code is a critical security vulnerability. These credentials should be loaded from environment variables or a secure configuration management system and never committed to version control.
| SENDER_EMAIL = "your_email@gmail.com" # <--- CHANGE THIS | |
| APP_PASSWORD = "your_app_password" # <--- AND THIS | |
| SENDER_EMAIL = os.getenv("SENDER_EMAIL") # <--- Load from environment variable | |
| APP_PASSWORD = os.getenv("APP_PASSWORD") # <--- Load from environment variable |
| for line in f: | ||
| if line.strip().startswith("- [ ]"): | ||
| match = re.match(r"- \[ \] ([\w\s@.]+?)\s+to\s+(.*)", line.strip()) | ||
| print("[DEBUG] Line:", line.strip()) | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The if match: block is outside the for line in f: loop. This means that the code to extract names and tasks (lines 43-56) will only execute after the loop finishes, and it will only process the match object from the last line in the file that matched the - [ ] pattern. This is a critical logic error that prevents the script from processing all the action items in the markdown file.
with open(latest_md, encoding="utf-8") as f:
for line in f:
if line.strip().startswith("- [ ]"):
match = re.match(r"- \[ \] ([\w\s@.]+?)\s+to\s+(.*)", line.strip())
print("[DEBUG] Line:", line.strip())
if match:
names = match.group(1).strip().split(" and ")
task = match.group(2).strip().rstrip(".")
for name in names:
name = name.strip()
email = name_to_email.get(name)
if email:
structured.append({
"name": name,
"email": email,
"task": task
})
else:
print(f"[SKIP] Name '{name}' not found in name_email_map")
# Use OpenAI to group or pair tasks| if len(sys.argv) < 2: | ||
| print("❌ Error: Panopto URL not provided.") | ||
| sys.exit(1) | ||
| panopto_url = sys.argv[1] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
These lines check sys.argv directly to see if a URL was provided and exit if not. This duplicates and conflicts with the argparse logic (lines 676-678) which already handles the optional url argument and prompts the user if it's missing. The argparse approach is preferred, so these lines should be removed.
url = args.url
if not url:
url = input("Enter Panopto video URL: ")
run_pipeline_from_url(| def generate_code_recommendations(summary_text): | ||
| prompt = f"""Given the following contributions and action items, provide: | ||
| 6. Libraries that can be used to implement the new features | ||
| 7. Libraries that can be used to implement the new optimizations | ||
| 8. Libraries that can be used to implement the new libraries | ||
| 9. Libraries that can be used to implement the new research papers and articles | ||
|
|
||
| Summary: | ||
| \"\"\" | ||
| {summary_text} | ||
| \"\"\" | ||
|
|
||
| Respond in JSON format with keys: "libraries", "refactoring", "implementation". | ||
| """ | ||
|
|
||
| response = client.chat.completions.create( | ||
| model="gpt-4", | ||
| messages=[{"role": "user", "content": prompt}], | ||
| temperature=0.3, | ||
| ) | ||
|
|
||
| return response.choices[0].message.content.strip() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The generate_code_recommendations function calls the OpenAI API but lacks explicit error handling for potential API failures (network issues, invalid API key, rate limits, etc.) or cases where the API returns non-JSON content. While the calling code might have some handling, it's good practice to include try...except blocks around external API calls within the function itself to make it more robust.
| "redirect_uris": ["http://localhost:8081"] | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| fbq = { | ||
| "timeMin": start, | ||
| "timeMax": end, | ||
| "timeZone": "America/New_York", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| def _find_function_dependencies(self, func: Dict) -> List[str]: | ||
| """Find dependencies for a function""" | ||
| # This is a simplified version - in practice, you'd do AST analysis | ||
| dependencies = [] | ||
| content = func["content"].lower() | ||
|
|
||
| # Look for function calls in the same file | ||
| for other_func in self.code_analysis["functions"]: | ||
| if other_func["file_path"] == func["file_path"] and other_func["name"] != func["name"]: | ||
| if other_func["name"].lower() in content: | ||
| dependencies.append(other_func["name"]) | ||
|
|
||
| return dependencies |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The _find_function_dependencies method is noted as a simplified version. Relying on simple string searching (other_func["name"].lower() in content) is not accurate for identifying code dependencies. It can produce false positives (e.g., a function name appearing in a comment or string literal) and miss dependencies (e.g., indirect calls, method calls on objects). As mentioned in the comment, a proper AST analysis is needed for accurate dependency tracking.
| "metrics": {} | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| exclude_dirs = {"venv", ".venv", "__pycache__", "node_modules", "site-packages", ".git", ".local"} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No description provided.